2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Disruption of Autism-Susceptibility Genes by Gene Editing Predominantly Reduces Functional Connectivity of Isogenic Human Neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, these Drosophila and C. elegans results likely reflect a behavioral outcome of circuit-level hyperexcitability recently discovered in several human iPSC derived neuronal culture models of a number of monogenic ASD risk factors. 68,139 The results also provide a plausible explanation for inconsistent reports of impaired habituation in humans, which variably employ diverse response metrics most often without genetic stratification of patient populations. 69 While these shared phenotypes are exciting, our results also reveal a remarkable diversity and modularity in phenotypic disruptions, and thus clearly indicate that single phenotype in vivo functional validation and characterization efforts will be insufficient to capture the complex multi-facetted phenotypic disruptions that stem from inactivating mutations in ASD-associated genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, these Drosophila and C. elegans results likely reflect a behavioral outcome of circuit-level hyperexcitability recently discovered in several human iPSC derived neuronal culture models of a number of monogenic ASD risk factors. 68,139 The results also provide a plausible explanation for inconsistent reports of impaired habituation in humans, which variably employ diverse response metrics most often without genetic stratification of patient populations. 69 While these shared phenotypes are exciting, our results also reveal a remarkable diversity and modularity in phenotypic disruptions, and thus clearly indicate that single phenotype in vivo functional validation and characterization efforts will be insufficient to capture the complex multi-facetted phenotypic disruptions that stem from inactivating mutations in ASD-associated genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Rapid advances in gene discovery and orthology prediction have altered the gene lists used during the course of this project, a challenge facing similar recent systematic investigations of ASD-associated gene function. 67,68 Despite these shifts, our list still covers 82% (14/17) of the most strongly associated genes from Satterstrom et al and 87% (13/15) of the SFARI Gene high confidence category listed genes (Table S1) with a viable ortholog deletion or severe missense allele available. This led to a mix of currently defined high-and mid-confidence ASDassociated genes, giving us a unique opportunity to study putative ASD-associated genes of completely unknown function alongside well established genes with known roles in neurodevelopment and sensory processing (See Table S1 for a complete listing of characterized strains, orthology relationships, and ASD-association confidence).…”
Section: Asd-associated Genes Are Highly Conserved To C Elegansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ASTN2 (Deneault et al, 2018). Another study detected reduced neuronal firing in iPSCderived neurons of eight individuals with idiopathic ASD (Marchetto et al, 2017) and detected a correlation of reduced network complexity to behavioral and cognitive phenotype of the donors (Amatya et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cask-related Disorders Have Emerged As An Important Geneticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We also included genes that are direct targets of FMRP [64]. For the gene sets from other iPSC transcriptome studies, we curated previously described differentially expressed genes caused by: i) shRNA KD of SHANK3 in hiPSC-derived neurons [65]; ii) CRISPR/Cas9 heterozygous KO of CHD8 in hiPSC-derived NPCs and neurons [66]; iii) shRNA KD of TCF4 and EHMT1 in hiPSC-derived NPCs [67]; iv) shRNA KD of MBD5 and SATB2 in human neural stem cells [68]; v) shRNA KD of NRXN1 in human neural stem cells [69]; and vi) CRISPR/Cas9 heterozygous and homozygous KO of ten different ASD-related genes in iPSCs and iPSC-derived neurons [70]. Full gene lists are provided in Supplemental Table 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%