1995
DOI: 10.1021/la00012a036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete and Partial Miscibility in Binary Monolayers of Phosphatidylethanolamines with Different Lengths of Acyl Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase P 2 , consisting of monopalmitin molecules which, as a result of the LE−LC phase transition carried out at 14.5 mN/m, change their orientation from a horizontal position ( liquid−expanded state ) to a vertical position ( liquid−condensed state ) (Mp (v) ). This orientation change provokes their immiscibility with the horizontally oriented PMMA horizontally oriented, The incompatibility of the components due to their different orientation in the interface is often reported in the literature. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase P 2 , consisting of monopalmitin molecules which, as a result of the LE−LC phase transition carried out at 14.5 mN/m, change their orientation from a horizontal position ( liquid−expanded state ) to a vertical position ( liquid−condensed state ) (Mp (v) ). This orientation change provokes their immiscibility with the horizontally oriented PMMA horizontally oriented, The incompatibility of the components due to their different orientation in the interface is often reported in the literature. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the results of Niccolai et al, related to mixed monolayers of 1-glycerol monooleoil (MON) and 1-glycerol monoestearoil (MOS), confirm the “empirical rule” that immiscibility of the components at the interface is due to their different orientations (MON, horizontal; MOS, vertical). Other authors , attribute the miscibility or immiscibility of the components to the physical state of their respective monolayers: when both are in the same surface state (for example in the expanded state), components are miscible at the interface, whereas if they are in different surface states (for example, liquid-expanded and liquid-condensed states), they are partially miscible or immiscible. In fact, this reference to the physical states of the monolayer is another way of considering the different orientations of the molecules at the interface, because the nature of the surface state depends on the arrangement of molecules on the water surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic parameters, namely the limiting area per molecule, the compression modulus, and the collapse surface pressure, obtained from compression isotherms give important information on the monolayer characterization. The mean molecular area is the most common and sensitive parameter to give confirmatory and complementary information on the packing of the hydrocarbon chains in certain “monolayer states”. , The packing of the chains is governed by the balance between cohesive forces, thermal agitation, and the affinity between hydrophilic groups and water molecules. On the other hand, the collapse pressures give definitive proof of the insolubility of components in surface mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%