1980
DOI: 10.1139/v80-377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete analysis of the 1H nmr spectrum of tetrahydrothiophene

Abstract: ANGEL LUIS ESTEBAN and ERNESTO D~Ez. Can. J. Chem. 58,2340Chem. 58, (1980. The 'H nmr spectrum of tetrahydrothiophene has been analyzed. The best set of coupling values (Hz) is: ,JA -,JB = 2.18, 3Ji = 5.53, 3Jfi = 7.31, ' J i e = 6.80, 3J19B = 6.37, 4 J i = -0.32, 4J6 = 0.25, 4JXB = 0.26, 4Jj,B = -0.47(A and B refer toa-and P-protons and c and t denote respectively the same and opposite sides of the ring). The variances observed between the values of this set and those reported by Lozach et al., particularly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical difference between the two glycoluril faces results in magnetic nonequivalence for the ether CH 2 resonances, which occurred as two doublets at 5.25 and 4.96 ppm (J = 12 Hz), with the remaining CH 2 resonance of the tetrahydrothiopheno ring occurring as a singlet at 3.45 ppm. The chemical shift of the latter resonance was found to be ∼0.7−0.8 ppm downfield compared to tetrahydrothiophene; 22 however, the inclusion of sulfur was supported by HR-ESIMS with an ion at m/z 307.0475 for C 10 H 12 O 4 N 4 NaS.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical difference between the two glycoluril faces results in magnetic nonequivalence for the ether CH 2 resonances, which occurred as two doublets at 5.25 and 4.96 ppm (J = 12 Hz), with the remaining CH 2 resonance of the tetrahydrothiopheno ring occurring as a singlet at 3.45 ppm. The chemical shift of the latter resonance was found to be ∼0.7−0.8 ppm downfield compared to tetrahydrothiophene; 22 however, the inclusion of sulfur was supported by HR-ESIMS with an ion at m/z 307.0475 for C 10 H 12 O 4 N 4 NaS.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be realized that for a methyl group the three rotational isomers are equivalent with equal populations of 1/3, therefore, equation (17) may be a reasonable approximation. On the other hand, when populations of rotational isomers are different, such as in the case of 1,2-disubstituted ethanes, the situation is much more complicated and the contributions from the torsional vibrations can be important [9][10][11][30][31]. The problem of the conformational analysis is then involved and the energy levels and wave functions for the appropriate Hamiltonian for hindered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The importance of vibrational contributions T vib J computed for the J couplings of near rigid molecules and methyl protons shows that these contributions must be inclu...…”
Section: Figure 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%