2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2016.1171093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementing the Latest APA Definition of Hypnosis: Sensory-Motor and Vascular Peculiarities Involved in Hypnotizability

Abstract: The aim of this article is to complement the recently revised American Psychological Association (APA) definition of hypnotizability. It (a) lists a few differences in sensorimotor integration between subjects with high (highs) and low (lows) hypnotizability scores in the ordinary state of consciousness and in the absence of suggestions, (b) proposes that hypnotizability-related cerebellar peculiarities may account for them,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these limitations, this is the first study providing findings concerning the EEG representation of the integrated static vestibular/neck proprioceptive information. In addition, it indicates hypnotizability‐related differences in line with earlier observations of hypnotizability‐related differences in the sensorimotor domain (Santarcangelo & Scattina, ; Petri et al., ). Finally, it shows that TDA is more powerful than spectral analysis in capturing such differences.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these limitations, this is the first study providing findings concerning the EEG representation of the integrated static vestibular/neck proprioceptive information. In addition, it indicates hypnotizability‐related differences in line with earlier observations of hypnotizability‐related differences in the sensorimotor domain (Santarcangelo & Scattina, ; Petri et al., ). Finally, it shows that TDA is more powerful than spectral analysis in capturing such differences.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, it shows that TDA is more powerful than spectral analysis in capturing such differences. In conclusion, findings support the view that hypnotizability is associated with physiological characteristics apparently unrelated to the proneness to accept suggestions (Santarcangelo & Scattina, ), and thus, it may be relevant to additional aspects of everyday life.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Hypnotizability is measured by scales 32 that classify high, low and medium hypnotizable subjects (respectively Highs, Lows and Mediums) who often exhibit characteristics intermediate between Highs and Lows 33 . Different levels of hypnotizability have been associated with structural and functional brain peculiarities [34][35][36] , differences in sensorimotor integration and cardiovascular control 37 as well as in imagery abilities [38][39][40][41][42] and in the behavioral effects of imagery [43][44][45][46][47][48] . In particular, behavioural studies of the vestibulo-spinal reflex (VSR) suggested stronger FE in Highs 48 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of suggestions and out of hypnosis, highs show less strict postural control and less accurate visuomotor performance. The highs do not exhibit learning effects due to task repetition in both postural and visuomotor tasks [2]. In contrast to the general population, reports showed increased pain perception associated with increased amplitude of cortically evoked nociceptive potentials during transcranial anodal cerebellar stimulation in highs [15].…”
Section: Hypnotizability As a Psychophysiological Traitmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hypnotizability is a psychophysiological trait that is measured by scales predicting the proneness to modify perception, memory, and behavior according to specific instructions named "suggestions" [1]. Several cognitive, emotional, and physiological differences have been described between the subjects with high (highs) and low hypnotizability (lows) out of hypnosis and in the absence of specific suggestions [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%