1978
DOI: 10.1148/126.1.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Use of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Studies of the Pancreas and Kidney

Abstract: 113 cases of pancreatic and renal disease studied by both ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) were analyzed retrospectively. CT provided a diagnosis when pancreatic ultrasound was unsuccessful due to overlying bowel gas or obesity and when renal ultrasound was unsuccessful due to obesity, reverberations from ribs, small lesions, or multiple lesions. Conversely, ultrasound provided a diagnosis when CT was unsuccessful due to lack of fat planes or respiratory motion. CT usualy distinguished carcinoma from pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In study conducted by Warshauer et al [25] specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USG for the detection of renal masses were 91%, 82% and 73% respectively. Our study correlates with study of Levitt et al [11] which concluded that CT and USG offer complementary and supplementary role in the evaluation of renal and pancreatic disease.In their study specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT for detection of renal masses were 100%, 90%, 100% and 96.88%. Accuracy was 97% as against 96.6% in our study.…”
Section: Discussion:-supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In study conducted by Warshauer et al [25] specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USG for the detection of renal masses were 91%, 82% and 73% respectively. Our study correlates with study of Levitt et al [11] which concluded that CT and USG offer complementary and supplementary role in the evaluation of renal and pancreatic disease.In their study specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT for detection of renal masses were 100%, 90%, 100% and 96.88%. Accuracy was 97% as against 96.6% in our study.…”
Section: Discussion:-supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In study conducted by Warshauer et al [10] (1988) specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USG for the detection of renal masses were 91%, 82% and 73% respectively. Our study correlates with study of Levitt et al [11] which concluded that CT and USG offer complementary and supplementary role in the evaluation of renal and pancreatic disease. In their study specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT for detection of renal masses were 100%, 90%, 100% and 96.88%.…”
Section: Table-8: Rcc Detection On Ctsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ultrasound and computed tomography are the best available means for assessing pancreatic disease [20,21]. These radiologic methods can usually characterize pancreatic pseudocysts and delineate their extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%