1991
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90379-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
330
6
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 540 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
29
330
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the tone CS predicts the occurrence of the US in a precise (explicit) time-dependent manner (CS-US pairing; context in the background), the increment in ACh release is less than in a situation in which contextual stimuli are the primary stimuli to enter into association with the US (CS-US unpairing; context in the foreground). Hence, in agreement with the well documented role of the hippocampus in contextual conditioning (Selden et al, 1991;Holland and Bouton, 1999;LeDoux, 2000;Nail-Boucherie et al, 2000;Anagnostaras et al, 2001;Maren, 2001;Desmedt et al, 2003;Rudy et al, 2004), the magnitude of ACh release would reflect the degree to which the static contextual stimuli are processed by the hippocampus for their subsequent association with the US.…”
Section: Hippocampal Ach Contributes To the Selection Of Relevant Cssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…When the tone CS predicts the occurrence of the US in a precise (explicit) time-dependent manner (CS-US pairing; context in the background), the increment in ACh release is less than in a situation in which contextual stimuli are the primary stimuli to enter into association with the US (CS-US unpairing; context in the foreground). Hence, in agreement with the well documented role of the hippocampus in contextual conditioning (Selden et al, 1991;Holland and Bouton, 1999;LeDoux, 2000;Nail-Boucherie et al, 2000;Anagnostaras et al, 2001;Maren, 2001;Desmedt et al, 2003;Rudy et al, 2004), the magnitude of ACh release would reflect the degree to which the static contextual stimuli are processed by the hippocampus for their subsequent association with the US.…”
Section: Hippocampal Ach Contributes To the Selection Of Relevant Cssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The rat will often begin to freeze when placed in the chamber, suggesting that it has been conditioned to the apparatus where the tone and shock were paired, as well as to the tone itself. Lesions of the hippocampus have no e¡ect on simple or discrimination fear conditioning, but disrupt contextual conditioning (Phillips & LeDoux 1992;Kim & Fanselow 1992;Selden et al 1991). This is consistent with the long-held belief that the hippocampus plays an important role in situations in which the interrelation of various stimuli is important (O'Keefe & Nadel 1978;Nadel & Willner 1980;Eichenbaum et al 1992;Sutherland & Rudy 1989).…”
Section: On T R I Bu T Ion Of T H E a M Yg Da L A A N D I T S C On supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Several studies indicated fear conditioning to context to be more sensitive to lesions of the rat dorsal hippocampus than fear conditioning to tone (Selden et al, 1991;LeDoux, 1992, 1994;Anagnostaras et al, 1999a), even though impaired fear conditioning to a tone (Maren et al, 1997) and intact contextual fear conditioning (Phillips and LeDoux, 1994;Maren et al, 1997;Richmond et al, 1999) were also found after such lesions. Moreover, infusion of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist APV into the rat dorsal hippocampus resulted in anterograde amnesia of foreground contextual fear conditioning, while this manipulation's effects on fear conditioning to a tone have not been examined (Young et al, 1994).…”
Section: Fear Conditioning To Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%