2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2012.2225151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Observer for Body Segments Motion Capturing by Inertial and Magnetic Sensors

Abstract: International audienceThis paper presents a viable quaternion-based complementary observer (CO) that is designed for rigid body attitude estimation. We claim that this approach is an alternative one to overcome the limitations of the extended Kalman filter. The CO processes data from a small inertial/magnetic sensor module containing triaxial angular rate sensors, accelerometers, and magnetometers, without resorting to GPS data. The proposed algorithm incorporates a motion kinematic model and adopts a two-laye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The raw data is processed here with the proposed filter and representative complementary ones including the LMA-Complementary Observer (LMA-CO) by Fourati et al [17] and Wahba's Complementary Filter (WCF) by Marantos et al [19] The factor of LMA in LMA-CO is set to 0.01 according to related literature while its complementary gain is set to 0.01 denoting the motion's change rate. The parameters of WCF follow the original author's determination that are given by 푤 푎 = 0.9, 푤 푚 = 0.8, 푐 1 = 0.7, 푐 2 = 0.3, 푐 3푎 = 8500.0, 푐 3푚 = 5500.0.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Comparisons With Representative Complementarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The raw data is processed here with the proposed filter and representative complementary ones including the LMA-Complementary Observer (LMA-CO) by Fourati et al [17] and Wahba's Complementary Filter (WCF) by Marantos et al [19] The factor of LMA in LMA-CO is set to 0.01 according to related literature while its complementary gain is set to 0.01 denoting the motion's change rate. The parameters of WCF follow the original author's determination that are given by 푤 푎 = 0.9, 푤 푚 = 0.8, 푐 1 = 0.7, 푐 2 = 0.3, 푐 3푎 = 8500.0, 푐 3푚 = 5500.0.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Comparisons With Representative Complementarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This commitment was revisited by Madgwick et al Journal of Sensors in 2011 showing that the gradient descent algorithm (GDA) could be another possible solution [6]. Besides, optimization methods like improved Gauss-Newton algorithm (IGNA, [16]) and Levenberg-Marquadt algorithm (LMA, [17]) are also applied for faster and more robust solutions. The above methods use optimization algorithms to compute attitude quaternion from the eCompass system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can significantly improve the attitude estimation results combined with gyroscopes [15][16][17]. Apart from Davenport's method, it is also noticeable that the singular value decomposition (SVD) could be efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical inertial/magnetic sensor unit contains a triaxial accelerometer, a triaxial gyroscope, and a triaxial magnetometer, and these sensors are usually assembled together on a printed circuit board to form an inertial/magnetic measurement node. Thus far, extensive research has been performed on how to accurately determine attitude information from micro inertial/magnetic sensor measurements [5] [6]. Some researchers even moved beyond this and proposed to Manuscript received May 21, 2014; revised September 17, 2014; accepted for publication October 31, 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%