“…Despite being broadly consensual that DNA-based methodologies allow a more accurate taxonomic understanding of prey items in digested material (Pickett, Bergey, & Di Fiore, 2012;Zeale, Butlin, Barker, Lees, & Jones, 2011), several authors still advocate the use of both nonmolecular (morphology) and molecular (barcoding) techniques to describe vertebrates' diets, particularly in terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., Groom, White, Mitchell, Roberts, & Mawson, 2017;Pereira, Xavier, Perera, Salvi, & Harris, 2019;Yang, Zhan, Cao, Meng, & Xu, 2016) and to study ancient dietary habits in humans (Sawafuji, Saso, Suda, Hattori, & Ueda, 2018). Stable isotope analysis was also recommended by some authors to complement the study of diet habits of aquatic organisms (Syväranta, Harrod, Kubicek, Cappanera, & Houghton, 2012;Tverin et al, 2019). Ultimately, however, DNA metabarcoding is foreseen as the most powerful tool to reconstruct both trophic networks (Roslin & Majaneva, 2016) and networks of ecological interactions (Berry et al, 2019;Bohan et al, 2017;Evans, Kitson, Lunt, Straw, & Pocock, 2016).…”