2017
DOI: 10.21106/ijma.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Feeding Knowledge, Practices, and Dietary Diversity among Mothers of Under-Five Children in an Urban Community in Lagos State, Nigeria

Abstract: Background and Objectives:Inappropriate complementary feeding is a major cause of child malnutrition and death. This study determined the complementary feeding knowledge, practices, minimum dietary diversity, and acceptable diet among mothers of under-five children in an urban Local Government Area of Lagos State, Southwest Nigeria.Methods:This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Eti-Osa area of Lagos State, Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling technique was employed to select 355 mothers and infants. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
11
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the short follow-up period implies that the long-term effects of the smartphone-based maternal education on undernourishment and linear growth need to be studied further. Moreover, the psychometric properties of the instrument used to measure the mothers' nutritional literacy based on WHO recommendations have not been established, but the approach assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices has shown acceptable face validity in multiple previous studies [28][29][30][31][32]. Finally, it should be taken into account that smartphone ownership requires some personal and socioeconomic resources, meaning that mothers burdened with severe personal issues or belonging to the poorest households in the community may not have been included in the study [34,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the short follow-up period implies that the long-term effects of the smartphone-based maternal education on undernourishment and linear growth need to be studied further. Moreover, the psychometric properties of the instrument used to measure the mothers' nutritional literacy based on WHO recommendations have not been established, but the approach assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices has shown acceptable face validity in multiple previous studies [28][29][30][31][32]. Finally, it should be taken into account that smartphone ownership requires some personal and socioeconomic resources, meaning that mothers burdened with severe personal issues or belonging to the poorest households in the community may not have been included in the study [34,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary outcome measures were the change in wasting caseness (WHZ < −2; yes/no) and the change in the mothers' nutritional literacy with regard to critical knowledge, feeding attitudes, and nutritional practice. The instrument used to measure nutritional literacy (Supplementary Materials) was based on WHO recommendations and has been used in several previous studies [28][29][30][31][32]. It was translated from English to Persian using a back-translation procedure in which ambiguous expressions were corrected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,[21][22][23][24][25]27,29,31,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] On the other hand the finding of this study is lower than in studies conducted in China (51.7%), Indonesia (50%), Ghana (46%), Sri Lanka (71%) and in Addis Ababa (59.9%). 12,18,28,[59][60][61][62][63] The possible explanation for the difference could be due to differences in socioeconomic status, variation in study settings and time gaps in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate cancer knowledge defined according to the score, >5 was considered as adequate knowledge women and levels of knowledge was divided into three criteria as, poor knowledge scores between 0 and 4, fair knowledge scores between 5 and 7, and good knowledge scores between 8 and 10. [ 9 10 ] Stratification was done with respect to age, marital status, educational status, occupation, and family income level. Poststratification, Chi-square test was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%