2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary energy based FE modelling of coupled elasto-plastic and damage behavior for continuum microstructure computations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the linear range this approximation must fulfil the upper and lower bounds given by Voigt and Reuss [13][14][15]. It has also been observed that in the case of concrete, especially if the softening behaviour is investigated, a method accounting for strong coupling between the meso and macro scales should be used, like those proposed in [16][17][18]. The present work, however, is limited to the analysis of the mesolevel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the linear range this approximation must fulfil the upper and lower bounds given by Voigt and Reuss [13][14][15]. It has also been observed that in the case of concrete, especially if the softening behaviour is investigated, a method accounting for strong coupling between the meso and macro scales should be used, like those proposed in [16][17][18]. The present work, however, is limited to the analysis of the mesolevel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the caseγ d > 0 orγ p > 0, there is damage or plasticity evolution and, according to (20), φ (σ σ σ ) as to remain null during the process so that the stresses remain admissible. We thus have the consistency conditionφ = 0 that can be rewritten as:…”
Section: Evolution Of the Internal Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If trial state is not admissible, then γ n+1 > 0 and, according to equation (20), the relation φ n+1 = 0 has to be satisfied. Solving φ n+1 = 0 yields γ n+1 ν ν ν n+1 .…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that instead of the polynomial fitting it is possible to use the exponential fitting or look for some harmonic representations, but general implementation with FEM programs decisively prefer polynomials similar to the shape function procedures. It also does not matter whether the finite elements will be implemented from a minimization of potential [36] or the complementary energy [41] principles. The nature of this technique allows almost automatically for sensitivity analysis since partial derivation of the sensitivity coefficients from the response function is very fast in any computer algebra system (following Direct Differentiation Method philosophy).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%