Complementary approaches to discursive contestation on the effects of the IPR regime on technology transfer in the face of climate change

Oh, Chaewoon; Matsuoka, Shunji

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.050

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They found that transaction costs also influenced the investment decisions related to projects. On the other hand, Oh and Matsuoka () investigated the effects of intellectual property rights on the transfer of environmental technologies. They focused on transaction costs, and reported that intellectual property rights facilitate the technology transfer by, for example, a reduction in transaction costs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change studies have been gaining increasing importance in the academic debate, and also in the field of organizations and management. Scholars have contributed to this field by borrowing approaches from sustainable business research. However, some authors have raised unanswered questions about the contribution of these studies to the management theories. According to them, climate change studies have failed to provide theoretical insights and too often they have adopted a descriptive and practical approach. Our review describes the theoretical contribution of the climate change papers, identifying the most often used management theories. The analysis results for 28 different management theories indicate that, while some theories such as the institutional and stakeholder theories have been widely debated, the relation between business climate change strategies and other organization theories still appears to be unexplored.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Even if not the most decisive factor, IPR issues demand attention, at least in sectors such as health. The impact of IPRs on ITT is contested (Abdel-Latif, 2015;Oh & Matsuoka, 2016;Rai & Funkhouser, 2015). Scholarly investigations reveal that IPRs can both promote and hinder ITT depending on the context (Kowalski et al, 2017;Mark, 2016).…”

Section: The Role Of International Technology Transfer and Its Channelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scholarly investigations reveal that IPRs can both promote and hinder ITT depending on the context (Kowalski et al, 2017;Mark, 2016). For some, IPRs act as "catalyst" for technological collaborations between actors by rewarding innovators (Oh & Matsuoka, 2016). In this frame, stronger IPR frameworks incentivize domestic innovation and create a welcoming setting for influx of foreign technologies by creating formal channels of ITT through trade, FDI, licensing, and so forth (Branstetter et al, 2006;Mark, 2016;Rai & Funkhouser, 2015).…”

Section: The Role Of International Technology Transfer and Its Channelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries

Pandey

Coninck

Sagar

2021

WIREs Energy & Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While technology continues to be seen as a key element in the move to sustainable development, international efforts around technology to support sustainable development transitions in developing countries have failed to yield results congruent with the needs. This review paper aims to contribute to, and help change, the conversation on international technology transfer (ITT) such that it leads to more productive international cooperative efforts for sustainable development in developing nations. We examine ITT in the health, agriculture, and climate and energy areas, juxtaposing it with relevant literature. Supporting domestic and international actors and processes, we highlight what are key elements for success in these areas of action to more effectively implement the SDGs in energy and environment in developing countries. Finally, we suggest that “innovation cooperation” is a better framing than “technology transfer” for advancing international efforts on technology for sustainable development. Such a framing allows for a broader and more comprehensive perspective on technology‐related cooperation between countries. It also emphasizes the need for equitable partnerships rather than donor–recipient relationships and for development of local innovation capabilities, leading to more effective marshaling of technologies to help developing countries achieve sustainable development. This article is categorized under: Energy Policy and Planning > Economics and Policy Energy and Climate > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Research & Innovation > Climate and Environment

show abstract

“…Universities play a role in the research and innovation on new technology development. The core issue in this study was to discuss how universities could make effective use of limited resources and complete academic R&D effectively [22][23][24][25].…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Intertwined Relationships of the Drivers for University Technology Transfer

Sun

2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Universities are the best places to gather knowledge and innovation, but the basis of technological development lies in talented R&D personnel who provide services to enterprise R&D activities, research institutions, and universities. Universities also gather many elites who cultivate talent for the country. However, universities do not have adequate technology transfer experience and do not network in industrial circles, which results in a huge gap between the concept and the practical result. This research determined the critical success factors and explored the causal relationships influencing the technology transfer from universities. We found that the main impact of the key factors was the technology market dimension. University technology transfer activities had to be classified as top priority. Technology industrial applicability was the main key evaluation factor, along with inventor attitude. In the organizational culture dimension, the attitude and ability of top management were the main evaluation factors. We attempted to draw upon our analysis results to make recommendations related to technology transfer to assist universities in successfully transferring their research results.

show abstract

Complementary approaches to discursive contestation on the effects of the IPR regime on technology transfer in the face of climate change

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies

A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies

Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries

Evaluating the Intertwined Relationships of the Drivers for University Technology Transfer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About