2018
DOI: 10.1186/s41476-018-0085-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary analysis of Mueller-matrix images of optically anisotropic highly scattering biological tissues

Abstract: Background: Using optical techniques for tissue diagnostics (so-called 'optical biopsy') has been a subject of extensive research for many years. Various groups have been exploring different spectral and/or imaging modalities (e.g. diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, autofluorescence, Raman spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), polarized light microscopy, etc.) for biomedical applications. In this paper, we report on using multi-wavelength imaging Mueller polarimetry combined with an appropriated ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrices were diagonal for all 21 measured samples (3 samples for each of 7 stages of the disease), which means that paraffin-embedded blocks of mouse brain tissue acted as a partial depolarizer and did not exhibit any anisotropy of amplitude or phase. The spatial distributions of total depolarization parameter ∆= 1 − 22+ 33+ 44 3 were analyzed using statistical moments of 1 st to 4 th order, as it was done in previously published works 13,14 . The obtained trends of the 1 st to 4 th statistical moments (mean value, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) are shown in Figure 4 According to the obtained results, the statistical moments of the 1 st and 2 nd order of the distributions of total depolarization at different stages of the disease do not exhibit noticeable changes with the disease progression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrices were diagonal for all 21 measured samples (3 samples for each of 7 stages of the disease), which means that paraffin-embedded blocks of mouse brain tissue acted as a partial depolarizer and did not exhibit any anisotropy of amplitude or phase. The spatial distributions of total depolarization parameter ∆= 1 − 22+ 33+ 44 3 were analyzed using statistical moments of 1 st to 4 th order, as it was done in previously published works 13,14 . The obtained trends of the 1 st to 4 th statistical moments (mean value, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) are shown in Figure 4 According to the obtained results, the statistical moments of the 1 st and 2 nd order of the distributions of total depolarization at different stages of the disease do not exhibit noticeable changes with the disease progression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It has been shown that Mueller matrix formalism is a powerful tool in the study of biological samples. [2][3][4] This phenomenological approach describes the interaction of polarized light with a sample using a model of "equivalent optical circuit" built from the basic optical elements-diatenuators, retarders, and depolarizers. The extended toolkit of various Mueller matrix decompositions (data processing algorithms exploring nonlinear compression of a set of real values of 4 × 4 Mueller matrices) is available for data analysis and characterization of tissue optical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various imaging techniques, primarily based on transmission, absorption, reflection, spontaneous emission and scattering in light‐tissue interactions, have shown to be responsive to a number of subtle alterations in various diseased tissue. Mueller matrix (MM) polarimetric imaging based on the acquisition of 16 images has shown tremendous potential in precancer detection since the last decade and is best suited for a complete characterization of the biological specimen . These MM images are further processed to extract the essential optical parameters, namely, diattenuation, retardation and depolarization through Lu‐Chipman decomposition method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%