2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementarity, rivalry and substitution in the governance of forests: Learning from independent forest monitoring system in Cameroon

Abstract: The consequence of state controlled forestry in Cameroon has been the overexploitation of forest resources often in conflict with local forest dependent communities and state conservation objectives. The failure of state controlled forestry to achieve sustainable forest management has led to the emergence of new network like arrangements amongst which is independent forest monitoring (IFM) by civil society. The aim of this paper is to scrutinize the factors which affect the effectiveness of IFM governance netw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of complementarity commonly emphasise comparative advantage as a main starting point as well as the context-dependent nature and often at least partly emergent quality of complementarity resulting from interactions over time. We also find emphasis on mutual respect and autonomy of the actors involved (Coston 1998;Najam 2000;Mbzibain and Ongolo 2019). Studies that go into complementarity in advocacy collaborations address structural aspects rather than contingencies and relational dynamics.…”
Section: Complementaritymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of complementarity commonly emphasise comparative advantage as a main starting point as well as the context-dependent nature and often at least partly emergent quality of complementarity resulting from interactions over time. We also find emphasis on mutual respect and autonomy of the actors involved (Coston 1998;Najam 2000;Mbzibain and Ongolo 2019). Studies that go into complementarity in advocacy collaborations address structural aspects rather than contingencies and relational dynamics.…”
Section: Complementaritymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gyrd-Jones and Kornum 2013) to governance (see, e.g. Coston 1998, Mbzibain, andOngolo 2019). Analyses of complementarity commonly emphasise comparative advantage as a main starting point as well as the context-dependent nature and often at least partly emergent quality of complementarity resulting from interactions over time.…”
Section: Complementaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also strengthen the country's institutions in general and give them greater credibility in the eyes of the public. On the other hand, there is evidence that from this innovative concept of mixed governance, understanding has been gained about different formal and informal components, which often directly affect environmental and forest governance in these countries [80,81]. Many organizations involved in environmental governance often have to cope with and manage multiple variables, related to social constraints and expectations of the various stakeholders involved, usually due to a lack of competence or capacities of the ones holding responsibility [64,82].…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is very difficult to materialize in the short and medium term because of a very top-down, inefficient, and incompetent governance and institutionality, with bad practices rooted from colonial times [1,34,64,69,70,75,84,166]. However, there are some signs of awareness of the importance of migrating from the current top-down governance system towards a mixed system, including reflexive and arguably even environmental governance [37,64,[80][81][82]167,168].…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation