2019
DOI: 10.31261/tapsla.7564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementarity of Reading from Paper and Screen in the Development of Critical Thinking Skills for 21st-century Literacy.

Abstract: The skill of reading undergoes dramatic changes due to the change of reading interface readers are exposed to. Readers who want to be active participants of knowledge society need to perceive it as more than just a receptive skill. The study aims to assess the condition of homo legens, diagnose what kind of reading interface preferences characterize 21st-century readers, how they respond to texts considering reading both digitally and in print, accepting or viewing critically the underlying ideology of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Readers have to manage texts acquired from multiple both print and online sources adjusting their note taking formats accordingly. As far as research on longhand vs. typed notes is concerned, it still displays screen inferiority effect (Kong et al, 2018;Singer & Alexander, 2017;Ślęzak-Świat, 2019) as it indicates to the fact that that annotation on paper integrates more smoothly with reading than the on-line one (O'Hara & Sellens, 1997). Further neurolinguistic research (Vinci-Booher et al, 2016;James, 2017) corroborates such integration, proving that handwriting connects more visual and motor networks in the brain being conducive to memorization and retrieval of concepts that are written down.…”
Section: Translanguaging and Transmedia Note Taking Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers have to manage texts acquired from multiple both print and online sources adjusting their note taking formats accordingly. As far as research on longhand vs. typed notes is concerned, it still displays screen inferiority effect (Kong et al, 2018;Singer & Alexander, 2017;Ślęzak-Świat, 2019) as it indicates to the fact that that annotation on paper integrates more smoothly with reading than the on-line one (O'Hara & Sellens, 1997). Further neurolinguistic research (Vinci-Booher et al, 2016;James, 2017) corroborates such integration, proving that handwriting connects more visual and motor networks in the brain being conducive to memorization and retrieval of concepts that are written down.…”
Section: Translanguaging and Transmedia Note Taking Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When all of this is considered, reading from a screen differs from reading from a paper. Changes in the reading interface that readers are exposed to cause changes in reading ability (Slezak-Swiat, 2019). Today, it is important to learn reading abilities from screens in addition to those for reading on paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%