2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1km cycling time trial performance

Abstract: Objectives: Whilst the presence of a competitor has been found to improve performance, the mechanisms influencing the change in selected work rates during direct competition have been suggested but not specifically assessed. The aim was to investigate the physiological and psychological influences of a visual avatar competitor during a 16.1-km cycling time trial performance, using trained, competitive cyclists. Design: Randomised cross-over design. Method: Fifteen male cyclists completed four 16.1km cycling ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,26,27 As both groups similarly improved performance in PACER, this study further supports that cyclists are able to perform faster when riding with a virtual avatar, in comparison to a ride-alone trial. 12,26,27 Performance time reduced by 23 s (1.4%) in the CON group and 19 s (1.2%) in the DEC group from FBL to PACER which is greater than the smallest worthwhile change in TT performance and thus demonstrates practical importance. 22 Notably, no increases in heart rate, respiratory gases or BLa accompanied the faster PACER performances in comparison to FBL, refuting previous conclusions that the access of a physiological reserve was the responsible mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,26,27 As both groups similarly improved performance in PACER, this study further supports that cyclists are able to perform faster when riding with a virtual avatar, in comparison to a ride-alone trial. 12,26,27 Performance time reduced by 23 s (1.4%) in the CON group and 19 s (1.2%) in the DEC group from FBL to PACER which is greater than the smallest worthwhile change in TT performance and thus demonstrates practical importance. 22 Notably, no increases in heart rate, respiratory gases or BLa accompanied the faster PACER performances in comparison to FBL, refuting previous conclusions that the access of a physiological reserve was the responsible mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…26 This holds true for the results demonstrated in the CON group, perhaps due to the accurate perception of the pacer's performance, therefore allowing its presence to be facilitative. In the DEC group, the mismatch created in the participants' perceptions may have superseded the facilitative effects of the pacer and resulted in more unfavourable perceptions of exertion and affective valence, supporting previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was done to increase the participant's perception of the opponent as a realistic competitor of a level of performance within reach of the participant. Based on an expected performance improvement of 1% after FAM [8,13], the pacing profiles of the both opponents were constructed to a finishing time 1% faster compared to FAM. Although the pacing strategies differed between the opponent conditions, the finishing time of the opponent was for both opponent conditions exactly the same.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2. RPE scores (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) before, during and after the 4-km time trial (TT). In addition, the average % completion time (Compl time %) at the moment of asking RPE is given.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation