Competitor driven development: Hybrid of extreme programming and feature driven reuse development

Doshi, Vrajesh Pankaj; Patil, Vandana A.

doi:10.1109/icetets.2016.7602985

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some of the studies are discussed here. Researchers in [1] presented Competitor Driven Development (CDD) which is a hybrid process model that integrated the practices from Extreme Programming (XP) and Feature Driven Requirement Reuse Development (FDRD). According to Authors the proposed CDD is a selfrealizing requirement generation model which keeps track of market trends as well as competitor's next product launch to extract requirements.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using FDD for Small Project: An Empirical Case Study

Aftab¹,

Nawaz²,

Anwer³

et al. 2019

ijacsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empirical analysis evaluates the proposed system via practical experience and reveals its pros and cons. Such type of evaluation is one of the widely used validation approach in software engineering. Conventional software process models performed well till mid of 1990s, but then gradually replaced by agile methodologies. This happened due to the various features, the agile family offered, which the conventional models failed to provide. However besides the advantages, agile models lacked at some areas as well. To get the extreme benefits from any agile model, it is necessary to eliminate the weaknesses of that model by customizing its development structure. Feature Driven Development (FDD) is one of the widely used agile models in software industry particularly for large scale projects. This model has been criticized by many researchers due to its weaknesses such as explicit dependency on experienced staff, little or no guidance for requirement gathering, rigid nature to accommodate requirement changes and heavy development structure. All these weaknesses make the FDD model suitable only for large scale projects where the requirements are less likely to change. This paper deals with the empirical evaluation of FDD during the development of a small scale web project so that the areas and practices of this model can be identified with empirical proof, which made this model suitable only for large projects. For effective evaluation, the results of FDD case study are compared with a published case study of Extreme Programing (XP), which is widely used for the development of small scale projects.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using FDD for Small Project: An Empirical Case Study

Aftab¹,

Nawaz²,

Anwer³

et al. 2019

ijacsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Author in [1] proposed Feature Driven Reuse Development (FDRD), an enhanced version of FDD which considered re-useable feature-sets for development along with the new requirements. Author in [2] presented Competitor Driven Development (CDD), a hybrid process model which integrated the practices of Extreme Programming (XP) and Feature Driven Requirement Reuse Development (FDRD). The proposed model is a self-realizing requirement generation model which keeps track of market trends as well as competitor"s next product launch to extract requirements.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical Evaluation of Modified Agile Models

Aftab¹,

Nawaz²,

Anwer³

et al. 2018

ijacsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empirical evaluation is one of the widely accepted validation method in the domain of software engineering which investigates the proposed technique via practical experience and reflects its benefits and limitations. Due to various advantages, agile models have been taking over the conventional software development methodologies since last two decades. However besides the benefits, various limitations have been noticed as well by the researchers and software industry in agile family. To achieve the maximum benefits it is vital to fix the limitations by customizing the development structure of agile models. This paper deals with the empirical analysis of modified agile models called Simplified Extreme Programing (SXP) and Simplified Feature Driven Development (SFDD), which are the modified forms of Extreme Programing (XP) and Feature Driven Development (FDD). SXP was presented to eliminate the issues of conventional XP such as, lack of documentation, poor architectural structure and less focus on design. SFDD was proposed to take care of reported issues in FDD such as explicit dependency on experienced staff, little or no guidance for requirement gathering, rigid nature to accommodate requirement changes and heavy development structure. This study evaluates SXP and SFDD through implementing client oriented projects and discusses the results with empirical analysis.

show abstract

“…Doshi and Patil [13] presented Competitor Driven Development (CDD). It is a hybrid process model that integrated the practices from Extreme Programming and Feature Driven Requirement Reuse Development (FDRD).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This model introduced separation of concerns that help in handling complexity and maintenance problems. Refinement in FDD could be [13] Presented Competitor Driven Development (CDD), an Integration of XP and FDRD. CDD is a self-realizing requirement generation model that develop software product for mass targeted customers.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simplified FDD Process Model

Nawaz¹,

Aftab²,

Anwer³

2017

IJMECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feature driven development (FDD) is a process oriented and client centric agile software development model which develops a software according to client valued features. Like other agile models it also has adaptive and incremental nature to implement required functionality in short iterations. FDD mainly focus on designing and building aspects of software development with more emphasis on quality. However less responsiveness to changing requirements, reliance on experienced staff and less appropriateness for small scale projects are the main problems. To overcome these problems a Simplified Feature Driven Development (SFDD) model is proposed in this paper. In SFDD we have modified the phases of classical FDD for small to medium scale projects that can handle changing requirements with small teams in efficient and effective manner.

show abstract

Competitor driven development: Hybrid of extreme programming and feature driven reuse development

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Using FDD for Small Project: An Empirical Case Study

Using FDD for Small Project: An Empirical Case Study

Empirical Evaluation of Modified Agile Models

Simplified FDD Process Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About