Competitiveness Analysis of Institutes on Biomedical Magnesium Alloys

Kim, Jong‐Heon; Noh, Kyung-Ran; Yoo, Jae Young; Kil, Sang-Cheol

doi:10.14233/ajchem.2014.17215

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Liu and colleagues [15] introduced the industry share, i.e., the percentage of papers in a given research area, as an index to reflect an institution's rank in a given research area. In other institutional analyses, Solanki [16] used international collaborative papers (ICP), highly cited papers (HiCP), g-index, hg-index, p-index; Kim et al [17] used Q1 (index level of paper quality) and Q2 (strength of international collaboration). Similarly, Ruiz-Coronel [18] and Zhong [19] both make use of international cooperation and self-defined High-quality papers to analyze the international status of Chinese research institutions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-related Research Organizations through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Zhao

Wang

Xiong

et al. 2022

Science & Technology Libraries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-related Research Organizations through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Zhao

Wang

Xiong

et al. 2022

Science & Technology Libraries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-Related Research Organizations Through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Zhao¹,

Wang²,

Yang³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological advances in tea production are critical to meet global demands for tea consumption. To illuminate differences in the scientific and commercial relevance of research programs between major tea-related research organizations around the world, we conducted a bibliometric analysis comparing the scientific outputs, including peer-reviewed publications and patents, of six major research organizations published between January 01, 2008 and July 11, 2020. For this competitive ranking analysis, we examined a number of papers, research topics, academic influence, capacity for development, capacity for collaboration, and capacity for technological innovation. Among the six research organizations, Anhui Agricultural University (in China) had the most publications, while the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tea Research Institute showed a higher capacity for development. The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (in India) and the University of Shizuoka (Japan) both showed high academic influence, while the University of Shizuoka, Tea Research Association Tocklai and National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (Japan) showed a high capacity for collaboration. The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tea Research Institute applied for the most patents, while the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research applied for the most international patents.

show abstract

Competitiveness Analysis of Institutes on Biomedical Magnesium Alloys

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-related Research Organizations through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-related Research Organizations through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Competitive Ranking of Six Major Tea-Related Research Organizations Through Bibliometric Analysis of Publications and Patents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About