Competitive strategy, capabilities and uncertainty in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in China and the United States

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate linkages among competitive strategy, strategic capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and organizational performance in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in China and the USA. Design/methodology/approach – In China, a survey was administered to managers of SMEs in Shanghai and Guangzhou. In the USA, a survey was administered to managers of SMEs in three major cities. Competitive strategy, capabilities, uncertainty, and performance were measured by previously validated scales. Findings – Findings support the integrity Miles and Snow generic strategic typology. Performance satisfaction was significantly lower in firms employing a reactor strategy as opposed to those employing prospector, defender, or analyzer strategies. Additional support was found for the concept of strategic clarity, as businesses reporting moderate strategic clarity had lower levels of satisfaction with performance than those reporting either a single strategy or a combination emphasis on three equal strategies. Practical implications – Chinese SMEs tend to prefer cost-based approaches to their local markets. A differentiation market approach is challenging in most local Chinese economies due to the low wages of most jobs in an economy that is still largely centrally planned. In the USA, more disposable income leads to more market opportunities. While this situation is gradually changing in China, it is not at a point where SMEs feel comfortable pursuing totally differentiated strategies. Originality/value – Several distinctions in competitive strategy, capabilities, and environmental uncertainty between China and the USA are recognized by analysis. Analyzers and defenders in Chinese SMEs tend to follow industry prospectors with lower prices and/or superior service. They might change strategies after gaining a foothold in the market. Performance for SMEs with low strategic clarity often depends on established guanxi with governmental agencies or stated-owned enterprises, a situation very different from that in the USA.

Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy

“…Our findings strongly supported Anwar (2018) who found that CA is a significant factor that can enhance the performance of SMEs in Pakistan. Similarly, Parnell et al (2015) also argued that a firm with a sustainable competitive position in the market enjoys superior profitability.…”

“…Both competitive strategies are associated with high performance of SMEs but not always (Parnell 2010). For instance, Chinese firms often tend to follow cost-based competitive strategies instead of a differentiating-based strategy which may require high financial capabilities and resources (Parnell et al 2015). Both strategies of Porter-cost leadership and differentiation-based-have a significant influence on the financial and non-financial performance of SMEs (Oyewobi et al 2015).…”

Profiting from Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Competitive Strategy

“…Cost-Leadership Strategy (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.828; AVE = 0.557) Our manufacturing costs were lower than our competitors' 0.713 Our efficient internal operation system decreased the cost of our products 0.800 Our economy of scale enabled us to achieve a cost advantage 0.741 We achieve a cost-leadership position in our industry 0.728 Measures of competitive strategy were adapted from Li and Li [19]. They have been demonstrated as being reasonably reliable and valid in the Chinese context [80,84]. Four items were used to operationalize differentiation strategy, reflecting the extent to which firms differentiate themselves from competitors in products and services.…”

A Review of Critical Success Factors Which Drives the Performance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

“…Very few studies have been carried out in the last two decades to discover the key factors that can prevent enterprises from continual failure (Wild, 2010;Collett, Pandit & Saarikko, 2014). There is confusion about the factors and actions likely to facilitate the success of enterprises (Liou & Smith, 2006;Laitinen, 2011;Parnell, Long & Lester, 2015). Thus, it seems that as of now there is no study that has been carried out to conclusively provide the meaning of success to MSMEs entrepreneurs.…”

“…However, there is also an argument that strategic business planning is not feasible in MSMEs because of the volatile business environment in which most MSMEs operate (Pekkola, Saunila & Rantanen, 2016). As a result most MSMEs shun formal planning (Parnell et al, 2015). Previous research indicates existence of a clear relationship between lack of planning by MSMEs and business failure (Jayawarna, Macpherson & Wilson, 2007).…”