2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive kinetic processes in the thermal rearrangement of 1,1-difluoro-2-(dideuteriomethylene)-cyclopropane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dolbier et al investigated the thermal rearrangement at 180 8C of 1,1-difluoro-2-(dideuteriomethylene)-cyclopropane, which led to a mixture of three components constituted of the starting material, the reversible rearranged 1,1-difluoro-3,3-dideuterio-2-methylenecyclopropane, and the reversible rearranged 2,2-dideuterio-1-(difluoromethylene)-cyclopropane. [131] The observed experimental ratio of the two rate constants (2.3) was consistent with the strong preference of a CF 2 radical center for a pyramidal geometry.…”
Section: Rearrangementssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Dolbier et al investigated the thermal rearrangement at 180 8C of 1,1-difluoro-2-(dideuteriomethylene)-cyclopropane, which led to a mixture of three components constituted of the starting material, the reversible rearranged 1,1-difluoro-3,3-dideuterio-2-methylenecyclopropane, and the reversible rearranged 2,2-dideuterio-1-(difluoromethylene)-cyclopropane. [131] The observed experimental ratio of the two rate constants (2.3) was consistent with the strong preference of a CF 2 radical center for a pyramidal geometry.…”
Section: Rearrangementssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Herein, we report the results of our study. We find that the presence of two CF 2 groups destabilizes the cyclopropane ring of 9, not only relative to the TS for ring opening, but also relative to the diradical intermediate (10) in the rearrangement and to the product formed (11). Consequently, as conjectured by Dolbier and co-workers, 12 the low E a for rearrangement of 9 is due to destabilizing interactions between the vicinal CF 2 groups in 9, rather than to stabilization of the TS by the presence of two CF 2 groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Dolbier examined the rearrangement of 1,1-difluoro-2-methylenecyclopropane ( 96 ) ( Scheme 45 ) [ 92 ]. At 210 °C the rate of cleavage of the proximal bond was only 3.8 times faster than for the analogous hydrocarbon.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%