2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive interactions across a soil fertility gradient in a multispecies forest

Abstract: Summary1. Whether plant competition grows stronger or weaker across a soil fertility gradient is an area of great debate in plant ecology. We examined the effects of competition and soil fertility and their interaction on growth rates of the four dominant tree species in the sub-boreal spruce forest of British Columbia. 2. We tested separate soil nutrient and moisture indices and found much stronger support for models that included the nutrient index as a measure of soil fertility. 3. Competition, soil fertili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, mycorrhizal fungi may respond positively to fertilizer addition if they are nutrient limited (Treseder and Allen 2002) or, more in line with the evidence observed here, if they respond positively to associated changes in soil pH (Kluber et al 2012;Walker et al 2014). Significant indicator OTUs in the unfertilized treatment included fungal genera identified as putative plant pathogens, antagonists of other fungi, and saprotrophs, suggesting that fertilization may have impacted the strength of some biotic interactions, as has been observed for competition in some plant communities (e.g., Coates et al 2013), or may have simply increased the abundance of other fungi relative to those in these functional groups. Fungal community structure was not observed to be significantly associated with soil P, root biomass, or the fertilization treatment itself in the structural equation model, even though these variables represent proxies of resource availability for these groups of fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Alternatively, mycorrhizal fungi may respond positively to fertilizer addition if they are nutrient limited (Treseder and Allen 2002) or, more in line with the evidence observed here, if they respond positively to associated changes in soil pH (Kluber et al 2012;Walker et al 2014). Significant indicator OTUs in the unfertilized treatment included fungal genera identified as putative plant pathogens, antagonists of other fungi, and saprotrophs, suggesting that fertilization may have impacted the strength of some biotic interactions, as has been observed for competition in some plant communities (e.g., Coates et al 2013), or may have simply increased the abundance of other fungi relative to those in these functional groups. Fungal community structure was not observed to be significantly associated with soil P, root biomass, or the fertilization treatment itself in the structural equation model, even though these variables represent proxies of resource availability for these groups of fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A circular plot with a radius of 7.6 m was located around each focal tree since this plot size is big enough to capture most neighbourhood interactions according to the mean size of tree crowns and the distance to nearest neighbours (see Appendix S3). In this sense, the distance of each tree to its nearest neighbour was in most cases lower than 5 m. Plots of comparable size have been used to account for neighbouring competition in other forest studies (Papaik & Canham ; Coates, Lilles & Astrup ). All individuals of tree species taller than 1.3 m were identified, and their d.b.h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest structure factors were taken here as proxies of the environmental conditions because they may indicate some community processes such as competition for resources. For instance, a high mean basal area or DBH is associated with a high competition for light (Coates, Lilles & Astrup 2013). A principal component analysis (PCA) on all 21 environmental factors across the 74 plots defined a first gradient (PCA axis 1) of decreasing soil fertility and clay content and a second gradient (PCA axis 2) of decreasing dry season length and forest basal area and diameter at breast height (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%