Competitive influences of running applications on training habits

Abstract

The use of running applications (RAs) has recently been shown to neither increase nor decrease the risk of running-related injuries (RRIs). However, it is important to note that the study reporting these findings did not account for the influence of virtual competition or challenges, such as virtual leaderboards for certain popular "segments" and monthly "challenges" which reward users for completing predefined tasks in a given time period. Both of these factors may affect the training behaviors of RA users, and indeed may contribute to the risk of RRIs. In particular, the latter may mimic a predefined running scheme, which had a positive relationship with RRIs. Therefore, it is important for future studies to elucidate whether virtual competitions or challenges promoted by RAs influence running behavior, and consequently, the risk for RRIs.

Response: letter to the editor: competitive influences of running applications on training habits

“…Shei noted that the influences of virtual competition or challenges are not accounted for in our study [2]. We largely agree with these comments, since these factors may indeed affect the risk of RRIs.…”

Analyzing Consumer Loyalty through Service Experience and Service Convenience: Differences between Instructor Fitness Classes and Virtual Fitness Classes

“…On the other hand, in other sports contexts there are jobs that associate training and technology, for example combining indoor cycling with virtual reality [21]. Similarly Shei [22], notes a notable increase in the use of mobile application technology in running. Schwarz et al [23] also recommend the use of technology in mobile games, since the incorporation of games into everyday life in adolescents would help to improve physical activity.…”

Use of monitoring technology and injury incidence among recreational runners: a cross-sectional study

“…However, basic technology tracking univariate factors eg. training distance, or those based around creating personal best competitions with other runners, risk overreaching and overloading beyond internal capacity [ 19 ]. Effective reduction of RRI may be more likely with a personalised and evidence-based algorithm that takes into account key external and internal training factors, such as running volume [ 41 , 42 ].…”

“…These technologies are purported to motivate the runner, as well as provide detailed data on performance and tailored advice on modifying future training practices [ 18 ]. A potential concern, however, is that overreliance on technology, inaccurate or invalid algorithms, as well as participation in virtual running challenges, also risks poor workload management, overtraining and subsequent injury [ 19 , 20 ]. This is especially relevant given the recent conflicting theories concerning the relevance of equations such as acute:chronic workload ratios in reducing RRI risk [ 21 ].…”