2008
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive immunoassay by capillary electrophoresis with laser‐induced fluorescence for the trace detection of chloramphenicol in animal‐derived foods

Abstract: A competitive immunoassay using CE with an LIF detector was developed for the detection of chloramphenicol (CAP). The method was based on the competitive reactions between fluorescently labeled CAP hapten and free CAP, with a limited amount of anti-CAP antibody. The poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPA) hydrogel was added in the separation buffer as a dynamic modifier to reduce adsorption and enhance reproducibility. The linear range and LOD for CAP were 0.008-5 microg/L and 0.0016 microg/L, respectively. An ELI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of dcELISA herein is better than the previous report which had an IC 50 value of 0.3 ng/ml (Fodey, Murilla, Cannavan, & Elliott, 2007). In addition, the dcELISA detection limit herein is lower than the previous reported which had the detection limit of 0.03 ng/ml (Zhang, Wang, Fang, Zhang, & Jiang, 2008).…”
Section: Production and Characterization Of Antibodiescontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The sensitivity of dcELISA herein is better than the previous report which had an IC 50 value of 0.3 ng/ml (Fodey, Murilla, Cannavan, & Elliott, 2007). In addition, the dcELISA detection limit herein is lower than the previous reported which had the detection limit of 0.03 ng/ml (Zhang, Wang, Fang, Zhang, & Jiang, 2008).…”
Section: Production and Characterization Of Antibodiescontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The developed method exhibits the best LOD value among other flow methods with different detections, and better values of LOD were reported only for sophisticated capillary electrophoretic method with LIF detection [34], and also one of reported surface plasmon resonance method [37]. Table 3 does not include applications of LC/MS methods in food and biological material analysis, where LOD values are evaluated in terms of content of CAP in analyzed material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the assay time is shorter because the immunoreaction occurring in solution is more rapid as a result of solution phase kinetics compared to tradition IA. Till date, CEIA‐LIF has been employed to detect a wide range of compounds including proteins [], pesticides and veterinary drugs [], hormones [] and so on. However, MTMC detection using CEIA with an LIF detector has not been studied so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%