2006
DOI: 10.2174/156802606777057544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Gly/NMDA Receptor Antagonists

Abstract: Glutamic acid (Glu) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) where it is involved in the physiological regulation of different processes. It has been well established that excessive endogenous Glu is associated with many acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as cerebral ischemia, epilepsy, amiotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. In addition to the classical competitive glutamate receptor (GluR) antagonists, much effor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was unexpected because up to now the presence at position-2 of a substituent able to engage either a hydrogen-bond or a lipophylic interaction with the receptor sites was thought to be an important structural requirement for the anchoring of PQZ derivatives at the three receptor types. 15,30) It has to be noted that binding affinities at glycine/NMDA, AMPA and KA receptors of the 2-unsubstituted-1-carboxylic acid 10 are comparable to those of its corresponding 1-unsubstituted-2-carboxylic acid C. 21) This finding represents a novelty and indicates that the position of the carboxylate group in the upper region of the PQZ scaffold does not affect anchoring at the receptor sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was unexpected because up to now the presence at position-2 of a substituent able to engage either a hydrogen-bond or a lipophylic interaction with the receptor sites was thought to be an important structural requirement for the anchoring of PQZ derivatives at the three receptor types. 15,30) It has to be noted that binding affinities at glycine/NMDA, AMPA and KA receptors of the 2-unsubstituted-1-carboxylic acid 10 are comparable to those of its corresponding 1-unsubstituted-2-carboxylic acid C. 21) This finding represents a novelty and indicates that the position of the carboxylate group in the upper region of the PQZ scaffold does not affect anchoring at the receptor sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, glycine/NMDA receptor antagonists have other potential therapeutic applications, such as for the treatment of traumatic brain injury, chronic pain, drug and alcohol abuse and tolerance. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Over the past decade, our laboratory has been notably involved in the elucidation of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of different chemical classes of heterocyclic compounds acting as glycine/NMDA and/or AMPA and/ or KA receptor antagonists. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] One of these classes is represented by the 8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-5-oxo-pyrazolo [1,5-c]quinazoline-2-carboxylates (PQZ series) ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Varano and his research group reported the AMPA (2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazol-4-yl)-propionic acid) [40,41], Gly/NMDA (Glycine/N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) [42] and KA (kainic acid) [43] receptor binding affinity of 1,9-disubstituted-8-chloro-6a, 7,8,9,10, presence of carboxyl groups at position-1 and 2 which due to its electrostatic interactions between negatively charged carboxylate group and positively charged site on receptors increased the affinity of 23. Compound 25 showed highest affinity towards AMPA receptor whereas compound 26 exhibited highest affinity toward Gly/NMDA receptor.…”
Section: Ampa Gly/nmda and Ka Receptor Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a co-agonist, which binds to a specific strychnine-insensitive glycine binding site (glycine B) of the NMDA receptor, is necessary for ion channel activity 5 . Therefore, the glycine binding site was perceived as a unique pharmacological target and several highly potent glycine binding site antagonists have been discovered [6][7][8] . As, unsurprisingly, glycine B antagonist pharmacophore 9 does not look like a brain penetrant, this was one of the reasons for low efficacy in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%