2003
DOI: 10.1177/10442073030140030601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Employment

Abstract: This article addresses the issue of availability of competitive employment for individuals with significant disabilities compared to segregated day and work services. Despite the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Supreme Court decision in the Olmstead v. L. C. (1999) case and its emphasis on full community integration for individuals with significant disabilities, and the blending of individualized support strategies with the philosophy of self-determination in the 1990s, the majority of indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, maintaining safe spaces and retaining positions in the longer term therefore appears to be dependent on the worker quickly becoming independent, especially when communicating with supervisors and employers and working with coworkers. This is contrary to good practice exemplified in the quality indicator of a well‐coordinated job retention system advocated for vocational rehabilitation and supported employment programmes in the United States which enables programme to maintain regular contact with its employed customers to monitor their job stability and respond effectively to both planned and unplanned job retention support needs (Moon et al, 1990; Wehman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, maintaining safe spaces and retaining positions in the longer term therefore appears to be dependent on the worker quickly becoming independent, especially when communicating with supervisors and employers and working with coworkers. This is contrary to good practice exemplified in the quality indicator of a well‐coordinated job retention system advocated for vocational rehabilitation and supported employment programmes in the United States which enables programme to maintain regular contact with its employed customers to monitor their job stability and respond effectively to both planned and unplanned job retention support needs (Moon et al, 1990; Wehman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Another was to be open to the idea that a customized job for a student can meet employers’ needs well. Several employers recommended that their peers consider a model called Partners With Business, in which a co-worker provides on-the-job supports rather than external service system staff (Wehman, Revell, & Brooke, 2003). The suggestion was made for employers to set high standards for employees with disabilities, making them the same as for all other employees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the unique features contributing to the success of supported employment is the role of employment support professionals (ESPs) who assist individuals with significant disabilities to obtain and maintain competitive employment in integrated community workplaces (Parent, Unger, Gibson, & Clements, 1994;Wehman, Revell, & Brooke, 2003). Traditionally called job coaches, these professionals include employment specialists and consultants, job developers, job placement personnel, and transition specialists and other school-to-work personnel.…”
Section: Why Was the Certification Developed?mentioning
confidence: 99%