Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space: A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism

Abstract

This paper sets out a sympathetic critique of a series of writings that we refer to as new regionalist approaches to the city. We review the recent work on state restructuring/rescaling and the associated work on the new regionalism, on the one hand, and that on`global' city-regions, on the other. We identify key points of overlap and divergence between these two literatures and suggest that each understates the role of class interests, political alliance formation, and conflicts around the management of collective consumption and social reproduction. We proceed to outline the framework of an alternative and complementary approach in which causal emphasis is placed on the shaping of subnational state geographies by actually existing struggles and strategies developed around particular geographies of public and private investment and collective consumption, and their associated state fiscal, electoral, and regulatory arrangements. We argue that working from this position we are better able to understand why the city-region continues to constitute a strategically vital arena for managing conflict and struggle in contemporary capitalism.

Powering sub-Saharan Africa’s urban revolution: An energy transitions approach

“…Critically, this requires, Ôan appreciation of the complex geometry of power and the political and cultural struggles through which societies assume their regional shapeÕ (MacLeod and Jones, 2001: 670). A focus on the ÔendogenousÕ city and region and Ôcreating the conditionsÕ for transitions often ignores what drives urban-regional economies of infra-structure and in doing so underplays the differential economic, ecological and political positions of places and the wider role of the nation-state in devolving responsibility (but not power and resources) for technology and innovation strategies (Ward and Jonas, 2004). Critically questioning these relations between scales allows us to conceive of urban regions not merely as sites for receiv-ing national or international transition initiatives but also potentially as contexts for the development of more purposive urban transitions that may address local rather than national priorities (Bridge et al, 2013;Bulkeley et al, 2010;Hodson and Marvin, 2010).…”

The Relationship between Spatial Planning and Economic Competitiveness: The ‘Path to Economic Nirvana’ or a ‘Dangerous Obsession’?

“…In particular, emphasis is placed on Belfast as a driving force in the competitiveness of the city, its immediate hinterland (Belfast Metropolitan Area) and Northern Ireland. This connects to contested debates on cities as 'powerhouses', 'engines' and 'motors' of competitive city-regions (Harding, 2007;Jonas and Ward, 2007;Ward and Jonas, 2004). The recently updated RDS reiterates the significance attached to competitiveness.…”

Alternative Economies and Spaces : New Perspectives for a Sustainable Economy

“…This is the idea that the capitalism takes on specific institutional forms in different national contexts, and that identification of these 'national models' helps to explain path-dependent economic development trajectories. However, such work tends to focus on capital as an exchange relation and driven by global competition; it downplays the constitutive role of class relations, state structures and attendant territorial politics (Ward and Jonas 2004). Capitalism and its alternatives are variegated at many spatial scales.…”