2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive adsorption of Cu (II), Co (II) and Ni (II) from their binary and tertiary aqueous solutions using chitosan-coated perlite beads as biosorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, very little difference can be noticed compared to those reported for single metals [13]. The same functional groups were clearly involved, and no preferential biosorption could be remarked [35,36].…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, very little difference can be noticed compared to those reported for single metals [13]. The same functional groups were clearly involved, and no preferential biosorption could be remarked [35,36].…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The most logical reason for this antagonistic action could be explained as being the competition and affinity for same adsorption sites on the biosorbent in the case of binary metal mixture [32]. The decrease in sorption capacity for the immobilized biomass from binary mixtures was quite comparable to that obtained by others using various biosorbent materials [33][34][35]. On the contrary, presence of Cr (VI) seemed to make no pronounced inhibitory effect on the adsorption of Ni (II).…”
Section: Effect Of Ni (Ii) Removal In Binary Metal Systemmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The figures illustrate the surface texture and porosity of bark adsorbent with holes and small openings on the surface which increased the contact area. These will lead to pores diffusions during adsorption [12]. Morphological analysis of the raw bark and modified bark showed changes of loose bark into more compact form of adsorbent.…”
Section: A Characterisation Of Adsorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%