2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive adsorption of arsenic and fluoride on {2 0 1} TiO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The O 1s spectrum was divided into two peaks positioned at 530.1 and 531.7 eV, corresponding to metal oxide (M–O) and hydroxyl-bonded to metal (M–OH) (Figure S18). After the adsorption of U­(VI), the binding energies of M–OH peaks both exhibited a blue shift, and the area ratio of M–OH peaks decreased from 18.7 to 13.0% in the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode and from 16.4 to 13.2% in the R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode. , These results indicated that the Ti–OH groups on the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh and R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrodes were the active sites for U­(VI) adsorption, which can form stable surface complexes with U­(VI). , Generally, adsorption performance depends on available adsorption sites and specific surface area . However, the hydroxyl density and the specific surface area of TiO 2 tend to decrease with the increase of the temperature of the annealing treatment. The specific surface area of the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode was 499.96 m 2 /m 2 electrode area, which was almost 3 times that of the R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode (177.89 m 2 /m 2 ) (Figure S19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The O 1s spectrum was divided into two peaks positioned at 530.1 and 531.7 eV, corresponding to metal oxide (M–O) and hydroxyl-bonded to metal (M–OH) (Figure S18). After the adsorption of U­(VI), the binding energies of M–OH peaks both exhibited a blue shift, and the area ratio of M–OH peaks decreased from 18.7 to 13.0% in the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode and from 16.4 to 13.2% in the R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode. , These results indicated that the Ti–OH groups on the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh and R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrodes were the active sites for U­(VI) adsorption, which can form stable surface complexes with U­(VI). , Generally, adsorption performance depends on available adsorption sites and specific surface area . However, the hydroxyl density and the specific surface area of TiO 2 tend to decrease with the increase of the temperature of the annealing treatment. The specific surface area of the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode was 499.96 m 2 /m 2 electrode area, which was almost 3 times that of the R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode (177.89 m 2 /m 2 ) (Figure S19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…24 The O 1s spectrum was divided into two peaks positioned at 530.1 and 531.7 eV, corresponding to metal oxide (M−O) and hydroxyl-bonded to metal (M−OH) (Figure S18). 27 After the adsorption of U(VI), the binding energies of M−OH peaks both exhibited a blue shift, and the area ratio of M−OH peaks decreased from 18.7 to 13.0% in the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode and from 16.4 to 13.2% in the R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrode. 28,29 These results indicated that the Ti−OH groups on the A-TNTAs/Ti mesh and R-TNTAs/Ti mesh electrodes were the active sites for U(VI) adsorption, which can form stable surface complexes with U(VI).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The modification of nano TiO 2 can effectively improve its adsorption efficiency for more kinds of materials through the interface assembly of organic components. (Dong et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2019;Qiang et al, 2020;Roy, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water is an important pathway for the production and release of toxic effects of arsenic, and Podgorski et al estimate that 94–220 million people worldwide may be exposed to groundwater containing high concentrations of arsenic. Adsorption is the most commonly used procedure for arsenic removal, and a variety of adsorbents have been studied for arsenic removal, including zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, biochar, chitosan, and other materials. However, these adsorbents still have problems such as slow adsorption rate, low adsorption capacity, and low selectivity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%