2020
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2020.1781944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive adsorption and reduced mobility: N-octane, CO2 and H2S in alumina and graphite pores

Abstract: Because gas injection into geological formations is a common technology deployed for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), it is important to understand at the molecular level the relations between competitive adsorption and fluid mobility at the single-pore level. To achieve such an understanding, we report here molecular dynamics simulation results to document structural and dynamical properties of n-octane confined in slit-shaped alumina and graphite pores in the presence of CO 2 or H 2 S. The substrates are chosen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling studies are underway to better understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for these observations (e.g. Le et al 2015;Cole and Striolo 2019;Badmos et al 2020).…”
Section: Other Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling studies are underway to better understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for these observations (e.g. Le et al 2015;Cole and Striolo 2019;Badmos et al 2020).…”
Section: Other Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibrated insights into the fate of fluids in subsurface porous environments are needed. In this context, assessing the influence of pore sizes, shapes, geometries, surface chemistry on the structures, dynamics, , phase transitions, rheology, assembly, , and flow of confined fluids , is essential. Among these properties, there have been limited efforts to link the structures of confined fluids or assembly of molecules to the observed properties and the efficacy of fluid storage and recovery activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%