1984
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition Within Stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
118
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the fact that our model 480 predictions overestimated the species abundance evenness of the communities indicates that some level of asymmetry cannot be ignored to fully understand the dynamics of these 482 herbaceous communities. This result is in accord with previous knowledge on plant competitive asymmetry (Begon, 1984, Cannell et al, 1984. It further provides clues on how 484 to proceed to improve the model in the future.…”
Section: Discussion 460supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, the fact that our model 480 predictions overestimated the species abundance evenness of the communities indicates that some level of asymmetry cannot be ignored to fully understand the dynamics of these 482 herbaceous communities. This result is in accord with previous knowledge on plant competitive asymmetry (Begon, 1984, Cannell et al, 1984. It further provides clues on how 484 to proceed to improve the model in the future.…”
Section: Discussion 460supporting
confidence: 88%
“…stands, respectively: absence of severe competition when the distribution of RGR with tree size is negative, initiation of competition-induced mortality when the distribution of RGR with tree size is flat, and intense competition when RGR increases with tree size. Similar patterns were also obtained by Schmitt et al [55] for Impatiens capensis and by Cannell et al [7] for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.)…”
Section: Growth Analysessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In one-sided competition, larger trees are at competitive advantage over smaller trees and neighbours do not affect the growth and survival of larger trees (Cannel et al, 1984). One-sided competition has been expressed here by the ratio of the diameter of the subject tree to the quadratic mean diameter of the 810p4 Modeling individual-tree mortality in Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.)…”
Section: Selection Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two-sided competition, all trees impose some competition on their neighbours, regardless of their size (Cannel et al, 1984), and this can be described by stand variables such as density and basal area. The following stand variables were tested for inclusion in the model: stand density (N, stems/ha), quadratic mean diameter (DG, cm), basal area (BA, m 2 /ha), dominant height (Ho, m), Hart index (HSI) and Reineke index (SDI).…”
Section: Selection Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%