Competition Rule of the Multi-Criteria Approach: What Contractors in China Really Want?

Abstract

Abstract. Recent years have witnessed the diversifying means of competitive bidding, where the client plays a critical role in the determination of competition rule. It is widely recognized that the competition rule should be placed on a win-win basis to ensure that both the client and contractors are well considered with respect to their interests. Nevertheless, a vast majority of biddings fail to take account of what contractors really want. Using the methods of literature review and content analysis, 34 tender evaluation factors are proposed to compose the competition rule in China. Contractors' opinions on these factors are collected by virtue of questionnaire survey. Based on the Pareto law, it is found that the competition rule encompasses eleven key factors, and the composition varies slightly between public and private sectors. The Hotelling's T test is conducted on those key factors in common. The implication is that contractors can use indifferent factors (e.g., credit rating, construction plan, completeness of bid components, timely payment to workers) to improve competitiveness, while the client may utilize different factors to diversify the competition rule. This paper probably presents an earliest effort put to examine the acceptability of competition rule in the construction context.

A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management

“…The most popular hybrid MCDM methods demonstrate the advantages over traditional ones to solve complicated problems which involve stakeholder preferences, interconnected or contradictory criteria, and uncertain environments. Decision-makers could use multi-criteria decision-making methods [46] such as analytic hierarchy process [47], fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [48,49], fuzzy Delphi [50], analytic network process under intuitionistic fuzzy set [51], Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) [52], simple additive weighting and game theory [53], discrete two persons' zero-sum matrix game theory [54], Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), COPRAS, TOPSIS [55], as well as developing original models [56].…”

Market Commonality and Competition in Communities—An Empirical Study Based on Bidding Data of the Construction Market

“…There are many visible organizations in the construction industry, such as trade associations, bidding rings, and group companies [46], in which enterprises have similar realistic backgrounds and behavior patterns. Construction enterprises' competition is aimed at the project contracts designated by the owners, operate mainly in the way of "the bottom price winning a bid", limited by the enterprise qualification, and it is the owners who ask all of these [47]. From the perspective of market commonality, the construction market will have a "community-style" competitive relationship.…”

Investigating Political Risk Paths in International High-Speed Railway Projects: The Case of Chinese International Contractors

“…The data used in this study were collected from a specially designed questionnaire. As a popular technique to obtain data regarding attitudes and opinions, the questionnaire has been widely accepted by academia in project management study e.g., [39][40][41]. In this study, the questionnaire includes two sections: (1) questions to gather personal information (i.e., years of work experience, position, and institution) on respondents and (2) items to measure the importance of each factor on a Likert scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being very low, and 5 being very high.…”