1962
DOI: 10.2307/4040555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition of Setaria faberii with Corn and Soybeans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
79
1
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas annual grass and broadleaf control was inconsistent and averaged 79, 88, and 92% at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm timings, respectively, a significant reduction in corn grain yield was evident only when applications were delayed until weeds were 23 or 30 cm in height. These results agree with previous reports that suggested that little or no corn grain yield loss resulted from secondary flushes or regrowth that occurred after herbicide application (Carey and Kells 1995;Knake and Slife 1962). Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yield from one glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings was 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas annual grass and broadleaf control was inconsistent and averaged 79, 88, and 92% at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm timings, respectively, a significant reduction in corn grain yield was evident only when applications were delayed until weeds were 23 or 30 cm in height. These results agree with previous reports that suggested that little or no corn grain yield loss resulted from secondary flushes or regrowth that occurred after herbicide application (Carey and Kells 1995;Knake and Slife 1962). Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yield from one glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings was 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Subsequent application timings at each site also resulted in reduced yield. The degree of early-season weed interference in corn varies with weed density, species composition of the weed population, and environmental conditions (Hall et al 1992;Knake and Slife 1962;Lindquist et al 1999;Moolani et al 1964;Stoller et al 1993;Young et al 1984). In this study, corn yield loss occurred over the entire range of application timings but did not occur at some sites even at the 30-cm application timing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In our study 120 plants m -2 of green foxtail were estimated to cause a 26% yield loss of corn. Beckett et al (1988) reported an 18% corn yield loss in Illinois with 13 giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) clumps (five to eight plants Knake and Slife (1962) found a 25% corn yield reduction with approximately 150 giant foxtail plants per meter of row. Giant foxtail has been reported to be more competitive than green foxtail (Staniforth 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No momento em que um determinado cultivar de soja apresentar FIGURA 2. Efeito de 115 dias de competição de Euphorbia heterophylla L. sobre o rendimento de grãos dos cultivares de soja de ciclo médio (Hood e IAS-4), EEA/UFRGS,Guaíbo, RS, 1979/80. um crescimento rápido e vigoroso determinará uma limitação de luz, reduzindo a agressividade das plantas daninhas, sobrepujando-as (14 ).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified