Competition, intellectual capital efficiency and firms' performance outcome in India: a structural equation modelling

Tripathy, Trilochan; Sahoo, Debadutta; Kesharwani, Ankit; Mishra, Ajay Kumar

doi:10.1504/ijlic.2016.074350

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These outcomes do not necessarily signal that industry competition is unimportant for advancing export growth by improving productivity; rather, the takeaway is that a competitive setting is not yet sufficiently developed to drive productivity and export growth. Competition increases knowledge asset efficiency [79]. In a competitive milieu, knowledge assets, as a predominant resource, foster their usage in combination with other production inputs [80] or tangibles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Knowledge Assets Affect the Learning-by-Exporting Effect: Evidence Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Firms

Kim

Sung

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using panel data from Korean manufacturing firms, this study empirically investigates how knowledge assets impact the relationship between exports and productivity. We consider a scenario in which firms are situated in a globally competitive, knowledge-based environment. We establish a dynamic panel vector autoregressive model by considering the outcomes of various panel framework tests. A generalized method of moments estimator is employed to test the dynamic relationships among the variables, and a post-estimation test, Granger causality test, and impulse response test are performed. Our findings indicate the existence of a learning-by-exporting effect on the enhancement of total factor productivity (TFP). The result show that TFP can be improved by interacting with exports and knowledge assets, and that firms’ knowledge assets significantly and positively affect their exports. However, industry competition, as an external force, does not contribute to boosting firms’ productivity. We highlight the importance of continuously upgrading productivity, exports, knowledge assets, and industry competition by demonstrating that the present levels of these elements serve as the main source of their own future values. Finally, the implications of our results are outlined.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Knowledge Assets Affect the Learning-by-Exporting Effect: Evidence Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Firms

Kim

Sung

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Según Hejazi et al (2016) es la gestión estratégica del CI la que en el actual escenario de los negocios refleja una verdadera ventaja competitiva y éxito para la organización, más que el impacto que los recursos físicos y financieros pueden generar. Ello debido a que la rivalidad empresarial basa su eficiencia en la influencia positiva que el CI tiene sobre el DO (Tripathy, Sahoo, Kesharwani, y Mishra, 2016), tal como lo han evidenciado autores como Adreeva y Garanina (2016), Ahmed, Vveinhardt, y Streimikiene (2017), Barkat, Beh, Ahmed, y Ahmed (2018), Ferreira y Franco (2017), Iqbal, Latif, Marimon, Sahibzada, y Hussain (2019), Mehralian, Nazari, y Ghasemzadeh (2018).…”

Section: Capital Intelectual Y El Desempeño Organizacionalunclassified

Análisis bibliométrico del capital intelectual y desempeño organizacional

Flores¹,

Bernal-González²,

Valentín-Mballa³

2021

CATyP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La búsqueda constante de los mejores resultados es un tema prioritario en cualquier agenda organizacional, por lo cual, además de hacer un uso eficiente de los recursos tangibles, el desafío de los estrategas es capitalizar los recursos intangibles disponibles. Por ello, el objetivo del presente manuscrito es determinar la relación entre el capital intelectual (CI) sobre el desempeño organizacional (DO). El método empleado fue un análisis bibliométrico mediante una base de datos de 2,559 artículos científicos indexados en Scielo, Scopus y Web of Science, del año 1980 al 2019. Los resultados sugieren que el estudio del CI y DO ha trascendido en el transcurso de los años, puesto que la información presentada brinda una visión integral de la evolución e impacto en esta temática. Respecto a las limitaciones de este trabajo, debe mencionarse los recursos científicos utilizados en la realización del análisis bibliométrico (i.e. publicaciones científicas y bases de datos).

show abstract

“…The study's critical implications are as follows: (1) policymakers would acquire insights into the competition issues for FD in the listed firms in India (Tripathy et al 2016);…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Competition Affect Financial Distress of Non-Financial Firms in India: A Comparison Using the Lerner Index and Boone Indicator

Kanoujiya

Rastogi

Abraham

et al. 2023

JRFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Firms’ financial distress (FD) is a major issue for smooth business activities. Timely recognition of FD should be a prime concern; otherwise, it may cause a nasty bankruptcy situation. The FD issue is paramount to researchers, policymakers, and investors. Several factors, whether they are financial or non-financial, may be responsible for financial distress. Such aspects specific to the firms have been explored. Exogenous factors such as competition can also be responsible for a firm’s FD situation. In view of this, this study proposes to determine competition’s impact on financial distress in the Indian context. BSE 100 (“Bombay Stock Exchange”)-listed non-financial firms (NFFs) in India, over a timeframe of 2016–2020, are incorporated in this study. Panel data econometrics is performed for hypothesis testing. This study is novel in its approach, employing multi-technique analysis for measuring financial distress. FD is measured using Altman Z-scores, BOS, and AC distress scores variants. The Boone index (BI) and Lerner index (LI) are undertaken for the competition assessment of NFFs in India. The findings have contrasting views based on BI and LI; BI is positively connected to Z-scores; however, LI negatively connects to Z-scores. The findings suggest that competition (reverse of BI) positively affects financial distress (reverse of Z-score), while competition (reverse of LI) has an adverse effect on FD. It is also found that competition as BI affects FD non-linearly (inverted U shape connection). This means that competition (or market power) initially increases financial distress (or financial stability), and after a specific limit, it reduces financial distress. It can also be said that market power improves financial soundness to a specific limit, and after that, it starts decreasing financial stability. The study’s findings provide fresh and exciting evidence for the connectivity of competition and financial distress. This situation has noticeable implications for all stakeholders and policymakers concerned with the survival of Indian listed firms. The significant connection of competition with financial distress implies that all stakeholders should consider competition an essential element for a firm’s financial distress.

show abstract

Competition, intellectual capital efficiency and firms' performance outcome in India: a structural equation modelling

Cited by 4 publications

References 44 publications

How Knowledge Assets Affect the Learning-by-Exporting Effect: Evidence Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Firms

How Knowledge Assets Affect the Learning-by-Exporting Effect: Evidence Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Firms

Análisis bibliométrico del capital intelectual y desempeño organizacional

Does Competition Affect Financial Distress of Non-Financial Firms in India: A Comparison Using the Lerner Index and Boone Indicator

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About