1996
DOI: 10.1051/jp2:1996189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between the Bénard-Marangoni and the Rosensweig Instability in Magnetic Fluids

Abstract: The linear stability analysis of a layer of a magnetic fluid with a deformable free surface, which is heated from below and exposed to a uniform, vertically applied magnetic field is presented. In this configuration the temperature dependence of the surface tension, the buoyancy and the focusing of the magnetic field due to surface fluctuations act as destabilising effects.We show that this system has for thin layers a stationary codimension-2-point, which can be reached for experimentally relevant values of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute value of the imaginary part of −iω, |ω 1 |, gives the angular frequency of the oscillations if it is different form zero. The linear stability analysis leads to the dispersion relation [13,14,15] …”
Section: System and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute value of the imaginary part of −iω, |ω 1 |, gives the angular frequency of the oscillations if it is different form zero. The linear stability analysis leads to the dispersion relation [13,14,15] …”
Section: System and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore ω is commonly called the growth rate, which is in fact true only for its imaginary part in the chosen normal mode ansatz. The linear stability analysis leads to the dispersion relation [9][10][11] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑b͒ The normal component of the magnetic induction B = 0 ͓H + M͔ and the tangential component of the magnetic field H have to be continuous across the top and the bottom boundaries: 5,10,13,16,17 H z + M z = H e sin , and H x = H e cos . ͑8b͒…”
Section: The Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For EMG 901, the magnetization at saturation is M sat = 4.8ϫ 10 4 A/m. 17 Our study is valid only in the framework of a strong magnetic field ͑4a͒, so that we must consider a magnetic field larger than M sat to obey the strong field assumption. Then, should we take an exterior magnetic field larger than 4.8ϫ 10 4 A / m, our choice of parameters ͑see Table I͒ shows ⑀ H to be less than 0.001.…”
Section: Experimental Values Of the Dimensionless Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%