1955
DOI: 10.2307/1943308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between Sibling Species of the Pseudoobscura Subgroup of Drosophila

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Monographs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
40
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females of both species emerged, fly. in general, before males by about one day at 15 C and by a few hours a t 25 C. Similar results have been reported by Sokoloff (1955), Bakker (1961, Furuya andMuri (1961), andMiller (1964) for different species of Drosophila. Figure 2 shows the results of interspecies competition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Females of both species emerged, fly. in general, before males by about one day at 15 C and by a few hours a t 25 C. Similar results have been reported by Sokoloff (1955), Bakker (1961, Furuya andMuri (1961), andMiller (1964) for different species of Drosophila. Figure 2 shows the results of interspecies competition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Within a certain density range, larval mortality has been shown to increase in some Diptera [Chrysomyia (130) , Drosophila (11,67,110,121), Lucilia (108,130), Musca (20, 65,137), and Phormia (137)]. The same has been found to occur in some Lepidoptera and Coleoptera This type of relationship has been considered by Andersen (2, 3) in a brief review of the subject.…”
Section: The Deleterious Effects Of Competitionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(120)]. In some species it was established that pupal or adult weight or size decreased to a minimum value corresponding to the minimum larval weight necessary for pupation [Chry somyia (130); Drosophila (11,24,121); Lucilia (108, 130); Musca (65, 137); Phormia (137) . This minimum size limit has not been found in Ephestia (125,131) and in other experiments with Musca (20) , but this may be due to an abnormal variability between the competitors with respect to this characteristic in the populations studied.…”
Section: The Deleterious Effects Of Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wasp larvae the entire numerical decline (due to \~~ The fact that larvae of Dineutes nigrior under a food-limited regime display a slowed developmental rate would further moderate the use of cannibalism in population regulation, and allow higher ultimate survival. This extension of larval developmental time has been found in larval competition experiments with certain species of Drosophila (Sokoloff, 1955;Miller, 1964). In Drosophila, a species which possesses this capacity has the advantage in competition with a species possessing an inflexible developmental rate.…”
Section: Regulation Of Population Sizementioning
confidence: 67%
“…A similar explanation may or may not apply in the case of Drosophila. Sokoloff (1955) has pointed out that it remains problematic whether competition for food ever occurs in natural Drosophila populations.…”
Section: Regulation Of Population Sizementioning
confidence: 99%