2015
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e14-11-1500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between RNA-binding proteins CELF1 and HuR modulates MYC translation and intestinal epithelium renewal

Abstract: ELAV-like family member 1, or CELF1, competes with another RNA-binding protein, HuR, to modulate MYC translation and plays an important role in the regulation of intestinal epithelial renewal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
90
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(112 reference statements)
11
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the Cyp19a1 3= UTR represses the expression of the reporter gene at the protein level in a CELF1-dependent manner, but not at the mRNA level. This suggests that CELF1 represses the translation of Cyp19a1, in accordance with known properties of CELF1 (10,(16)(17)(18)(19). These results in HeLa cells seem to contradict the in vivo results, as we detected high levels of Cyp19a1 mRNA in Celf1 Ϫ/Ϫ testes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the Cyp19a1 3= UTR represses the expression of the reporter gene at the protein level in a CELF1-dependent manner, but not at the mRNA level. This suggests that CELF1 represses the translation of Cyp19a1, in accordance with known properties of CELF1 (10,(16)(17)(18)(19). These results in HeLa cells seem to contradict the in vivo results, as we detected high levels of Cyp19a1 mRNA in Celf1 Ϫ/Ϫ testes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the nucleus, it controls pre-mRNA alternative splicing (11,12). In the cytoplasm, it targets bound mRNAs for rapid decay (13,14) and/or modulates their translation (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The cytoplasmic functions are probably mediated by interactions with molecular partners, like the poly(A) nuclease PARN (20) or the translation initiation complex eIF2 (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when single IGF2BP3 binding sites were deleted in the MYC and CDK6 3′UTR, the majority of these deletions failed to reverse the phenotype in the reporter assay. The complexity of 3′UTR targeting is illustrated by the variety of RBPs and noncoding RNAs that have been reported to bind to the MYC and CDK6 3′UTRs (46)(47)(48)(49). Hence, RBP action on its cognate targets is likely dose dependent and cooperative; multiple RBPs have to bind to the same 3′UTR at different locations to exert an effect.…”
Section: Cdk6 and Myc Mrnas Are Targets Of Igf2bp3 In Vitro And In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only do CELF proteins bind to introns in pre-mRNAs to mediate alternative splicing in the nucleus, they are also powerful modulators of mRNA decay, as they compete with other RNA-binding proteins for the binding to GU-rich elements (Liu et al, 2015;Vlasova-St Louis et al, 2013). In the cytoplasm, CELFs bind to 5′ and 3′UTRs in mature mRNAs to regulate deadenylation, mRNA stability and translation (Dasgupta and Ladd, 2012).…”
Section: Mirnas Target Alternative Splicing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%