2020
DOI: 10.1101/gad.336891.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between maturation and degradation drives human snRNA 3′ end quality control

Abstract: Polymerases and exonucleases act on 3 ′ ends of nascent RNAs to promote their maturation or degradation but how the balance between these activities is controlled to dictate the fates of cellular RNAs remains poorly understood.Here, we identify a central role for the human DEDD deadenylase TOE1 in distinguishing the fates of small nuclear (sn)RNAs of the spliceosome from unstable genome-encoded snRNA variants. We found that TOE1 promotes maturation of all regular RNA polymerase II transcribed snRNAs of the maj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
8
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As primers span the Integrator cleavage sites, this suggests that DIS3 targets transcripts that escape maturation rather than competing with processing. This idea is supported by recent findings that mature snRNA accumulation is unaffected by exosome depletion (Lardelli and Lykke-Andersen, 2020). Following INTS1 depletion, a substantial fraction of precursors are lost after actD treatment either because of residual Integrator activity or degradation of the resulting unprocessed products.…”
Section: The Exosome Degrades Precursor Snrnassupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As primers span the Integrator cleavage sites, this suggests that DIS3 targets transcripts that escape maturation rather than competing with processing. This idea is supported by recent findings that mature snRNA accumulation is unaffected by exosome depletion (Lardelli and Lykke-Andersen, 2020). Following INTS1 depletion, a substantial fraction of precursors are lost after actD treatment either because of residual Integrator activity or degradation of the resulting unprocessed products.…”
Section: The Exosome Degrades Precursor Snrnassupporting
confidence: 58%
“…RNA was prepared from HeLa cells in which ISG20, EXO10, or TOE1 (positive control) was knocked down (Figure 4a), and the 3′‐end of U1 snRNA was analyzed by Next‐Generation Sequencing (NGS) analyses. The results in Figure 4b,c clearly showed that the 3′‐end of U1 snRNA was not extended in ISG20‐ or EXO10‐KD cells, whereas a clear extension was detected in TOE1‐KD cells (positive control) (Lardelli & Andersen, 2020; Lardelli et al., 2017; Son et al., 2018). Even the ISG20‐ and EXO10‐ double KD cells did not show the 3′‐end extension of U1 snRNA (Figure S3c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During the preparation of this manuscript, a paper was published showing that the nuclear exosome cooperates with TOE1 and degrades 3′‐unprocessed U snRNAs and U1 variants (Lardelli & Andersen, 2020). Our conclusion with the nuclear exosome was supported by their data (Lardelli & Andersen, 2020). However, our results also called attention to ISG20, a novel factor controlling the stability of the nascent transcript for U snRNAs and U1 variants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work revealed TOE1, a primarily Cajal body-localized deadenylase with nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling activity ( 42 , 43 ), as the enzyme responsible for the 3′ trimming of human snRNA precursors to their mature length ( 44 , 45 ). TOE1 thus represents another 3′-to-5′ exonucleolytic activity targeting the 3′ end of snRNAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%