1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00328719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between isogenic mutS and mut + populations of Escherichia coli K12 in continuously growing cultures

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that the mutT, mutH and mutL mutators of Escherichia coli have a marked advantage in competition growth with otherwise coisogenic wild-type strains. As shown in this paper the same is true for the mutS mismatch mutator. In three experiments mutS could outgrow the wild-type and had higher fitness values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experiments have primarily been performed in vitro in E. coli (Trobner and Piechocki, 1984a;Labat et al, 2005;de Visser and Rozen, 2006;Loh et al, 2010;Gentile et al, 2011) and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Thompson et al, 2006;Raynes et al, 2011Raynes et al, , 2012Raynes et al, , 2014, but some work has also been carried out in vivo by propagating E. coli populations in the mouse gut (Giraud et al, 2001). The focus of these experiments has not necessarily been to demonstrate mutator hitchhiking anew, but rather to explore the influence of various population genetic factors on the likelihood and dynamics of mutator hitchhiking, as discussed below.…”
Section: Mutator Hitchhiking As a Fundamental Aspect Of Asexual Populmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments have primarily been performed in vitro in E. coli (Trobner and Piechocki, 1984a;Labat et al, 2005;de Visser and Rozen, 2006;Loh et al, 2010;Gentile et al, 2011) and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Thompson et al, 2006;Raynes et al, 2011Raynes et al, , 2012Raynes et al, , 2014, but some work has also been carried out in vivo by propagating E. coli populations in the mouse gut (Giraud et al, 2001). The focus of these experiments has not necessarily been to demonstrate mutator hitchhiking anew, but rather to explore the influence of various population genetic factors on the likelihood and dynamics of mutator hitchhiking, as discussed below.…”
Section: Mutator Hitchhiking As a Fundamental Aspect Of Asexual Populmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-mutator mutants with lower than normal mutation rates have also been observed (reviewed by Sniegowski et al, 2000), albeit at much lower frequencies than mutators (Drake et al, 1998). However, within mutator populations, mutants with lower mutation rates (but higher than wild-type) can evolve (Tro$ bner & Piechocki, 1984 ;Giraud et al, 2001a). These studies show that evolution of the mutation rate is possible in evolving populations of bacteria.…”
Section: Mutation Rate Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence for such direct fitness benefits is at best indirect (reviewed by Sniegowski et al, 2000). Moreover, direct competitions between mutators and their repair-proficient equivalents reveal a small growth rate disadvantage for mutators Tro$ bner & Piechocki, 1984 ;Boe et al, 2000), presumably due to the increased production of deleterious mutations in their offspring. The magnitude of this direct cost depends on mutator strength (Drake, 1991 ;Tenaillon et al, 1999).…”
Section: Short-term Fatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for microbes, expanding offspring genome diversities by elevating replication mutation rates to achieve rapid adaptation and competitive advantages in harsh environments has been discovered and verified both in vivo [40][41][42] and in silico [43,44]. Various natural mutator genes have been isolated and analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%