2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition and tree crowns: A neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
99
1
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
99
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential importance of the competitive trees' species-identity is well recognized for tree growth, and has been demonstrated in several studies (e.g. Sumida et al 2002;Canham et al 2004;Uriarte et al 2004;Boivin et al 2010; Thorpe et al 2010). A plastic response in tree growth and architecture may be dependent on the neighbouring species, because species-specific differences exist e.g.…”
Section: Between-tree Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The potential importance of the competitive trees' species-identity is well recognized for tree growth, and has been demonstrated in several studies (e.g. Sumida et al 2002;Canham et al 2004;Uriarte et al 2004;Boivin et al 2010; Thorpe et al 2010). A plastic response in tree growth and architecture may be dependent on the neighbouring species, because species-specific differences exist e.g.…”
Section: Between-tree Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Boivin et al (2010) relataram aumento do poder preditivo do modelo de crescimento quando incluído no cálculo da competição o sombreamento da árvore-objetivo causado pela árvore vizinha competidora. Esta melhora pode estar associada ao fato que o resultado da interação (competição) determina o tamanho da copa de cada árvore individual, o que reflete na interceptação de luz, capacidade fotossintética, crescimento e até mesmo sobrevivência (Thorpe et al 2010).…”
Section: Análise Dos íNdices De Competiçãounclassified
“…Finally, the crown radius and crown depth models (Eqs. (2) and (3)) are relatively simple and do not account for the influence of neighborhood characteristics (e.g., density) on crown dimension (Thorpe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%