Reforming the Postal Sector in the Face of Electronic Competition 2013
DOI: 10.4337/9780857935809.00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition and the social cost of regulation in the postal sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owning the USP (or having a high stake in it) also allows states to influence the provision of basic postal services that are considered to be of general economic interest, in addition to a USO mandate. This additional channel may be an efficient element in the institutional setting for the governance of universal postal services (see [41]). In an empirical study, [42] found that privatization in fact has a negative effect on the quality of universal service provision (density of the postal network).…”
Section: Corporatization and Privatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owning the USP (or having a high stake in it) also allows states to influence the provision of basic postal services that are considered to be of general economic interest, in addition to a USO mandate. This additional channel may be an efficient element in the institutional setting for the governance of universal postal services (see [41]). In an empirical study, [42] found that privatization in fact has a negative effect on the quality of universal service provision (density of the postal network).…”
Section: Corporatization and Privatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems that regulatory institutions face when implementing e-government solutions are analyzed by many researchers (Baldwin & Black, 2008Baldwin, Black, & O'Leary, 2014;Blanc, 2013;Blendinger & Michalski, 2018;Carroll & Head, 2010;Cheng, 2014;Choudrie, Zamani, Umeoji, & Emmanuel, 2017;Christiansson, Axelsson, & Melin, 2015;Cledou, Estevez, & Soares Barbosa, 2018;Gil-Garcia, 2012;Hampton, 2005;Juell-Skielse, Lönn, & Päivärinta, 2017;Layfield, 2014;Luna-Reyes, Picazo-Vela, Luna, & Gil-Garcia, 2016;Maegli & Jaag, 2013;Maegli, Jaag, Koller, & Trinkner, 2011;Maume, 2013;Miyazaki, 2018aMiyazaki, , 2018b, who address such aspects as the needs of the society and business enterprises and the challenges and possibilities of meeting those needs, innovations of information systems and technologies, their implementations and impact on increasing e-government᾽s efficiency, regulatory reforms and processes, the best regulatory practices and possibilities to apply them. Researchers pay quite a lot of attention to the analysis of the methods of evaluation of the public sector institutions᾽ efficiency, however, there is not enough of all-encompassing scientific research and solutions regarding the assessment of the regulatory institutions᾽ consolidation while implementing e-government solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%