1989
DOI: 10.1177/104398628900500204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing Theoretical Explanations of Cocaine Use: Differential Association Versus Control Theory

Abstract: Questionnaires from 1,517 respondents were obtained by means of both a convenience and a snowball sample. 1,091 (72%) respondents had used cocaine at least once, while 426 (28%) had never used it. The data from this information about criminal cocaine use have been used to test the efficacy of two competing theoretical models of delinquent or criminal behavior, differential association and control theory. Both tabular and multiple regression techniques were used to analyze the cause of the respon dents' cocaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McCarthy and Hagan (1995) have noted the parallels between Granovetter’s assertions and the theory of differential association (Sutherland and Cressey 1994), which proposes that behaviors such as drug use are learned in interactions within intimate personal groups and in contexts where the behavior is defined more favorably than unfavorably. Prior empirical tests of differential association theory have found strong evidence for its utility in explaining drug use (MacDonald 1989). Both of these theoretical orientations situate personal drug use within the context of network socialization, forcing the need to examine the characteristics of individuals’ social networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCarthy and Hagan (1995) have noted the parallels between Granovetter’s assertions and the theory of differential association (Sutherland and Cressey 1994), which proposes that behaviors such as drug use are learned in interactions within intimate personal groups and in contexts where the behavior is defined more favorably than unfavorably. Prior empirical tests of differential association theory have found strong evidence for its utility in explaining drug use (MacDonald 1989). Both of these theoretical orientations situate personal drug use within the context of network socialization, forcing the need to examine the characteristics of individuals’ social networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment, in this case, does not have the strongest effect; however, it was still significant-The measures of commitment and belief, while only moderately significant, did add to the model. Differential association theory has had a long and significant history in explaining and predicting future criminal activity (Sutherland, 1947;Short, 1960;Voss, 1966, Sutherland andCressey, 1978;Marcus, et al 1986;MacDonald, 1989). The findings in this research suggest that variables measuring association can add to the predictive powers of a parole outcome model.…”
Section: Journal Of Crime and Justice I75mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Hirschi (1969), MacDonald (1989) andMarcos, et al (1986) have found that each of the elements of the social bond have relevance in predicting the incidence of future deviance, criminal activity and/or drug use. This research suggests that the social control theory has significant value in adding to a prediction model of parole outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same study concluded that all three of their differential association variables "were significantly and directly correlated with property, violent and drug offenses," particularly for male offenders (Alarid et al, 2000, p. 183, 185). Overall, offering significant support for differential association theory among incarcerated felons and offenders (Alarid et al, 2000;Burton, 1991;Macdonald, 1989).…”
Section: Social Learning Theorymentioning
confidence: 94%