Is first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia here to stay? A host of studies has shown that a combination of maternal history and biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-14 weeks of gestation is able to detect with high accuracy the subsequent onset of pre-eclampsia 1 . Moreover, meta-analysis has revealed that intervention is possible: low-dose aspirin prevents onset of the condition when started before 16 weeks of gestation 2 . This combination of a sensitive and specific algorithm and the possibility of intervention legitimates early screening for pre-eclampsia-analogous to the approach to aneuploidy screening.However, despite the striking similarities, it is important to point out the differences between the screening approaches to aneuploidies and to pre-eclampsia, especially when it comes to counseling patients. In the case of pre-eclampsia screening, there is no diagnostic test to hand to confirm a screen-positive result. Furthermore, there is no definitive intervention that can be offered; the evidence that low-dose aspirin is effective to prevent the condition has not been reproduced in prospective, randomized intervention studies. Fortunately, these are underway.In their study, Khalil et al. performed longitudinal measurements of soluble endoglin (sEng) and angiopoetin-2 (Ang-2) in patients at high risk for pre-eclampsia, as identified by first-trimester screening. In total, 122 women were enrolled and blood was taken every 4 weeks. Of these screen-positive patients, 85 stayed normotensive, while 12 developed preterm pre-eclampsia, 13 term pre-eclampsia and 12 gestational hypertension. The authors showed that the increase of sEng levels is steeper in patients destined to develop early-onset pre-eclampsia as compared with those who stayed normotensive. While the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) of sEng for predicting early-onset pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks was low (0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75), sufficient performance was reached at 19-22 weeks (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). No significant differences were detected when comparing cases of late-onset pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension with controls. No significant differences were detected for Ang-2.The study has strengths. It is a prospective study; measurements were carried out at 4-week intervals in patients who were screen-positive. It confirms results of earlier, retrospective studies showing that sEng is an early marker for pre-eclampsia 3 . The study has some limitations; the sample size was small, particularly with respect to those developing the conditions, and the performance of longitudinal measurements of other biophysical and biochemical markers has to be evaluated, in combination and not separately, preferably in larger prospective studies.The study of Khalil et al. offers a partial answer to our initial question. The authors have shown that sEng might be useful in 'secondary' screening for pre-eclampsia at later time points in pregnancy and especially when measured repeatedly. This and possibly other b...