Competing risk analyses of longevity in Duroc sows with a special emphasis on leg conformation

Abstract

A competing risk approach was used to evaluate the influence of several factors on culling risk for 587 Duroc sows. Three different analyses were performed according to whether sow failure was due to death during productive life (DE) or to one of two causes for voluntary culling: low productivity (LP) and low fertility (LF). Sow survival was analyzed by the Cox model. Year at first farrowing (batch effect) significantly affected sow survival in all three analyses ( P , 0.05 for DE and P , 0.001 for LP and LF) whereas farm of origin accounted for relevant variation in the LP and LF analyses. LP culling increased with backfat thickness of more than 19 mm at the end of the growth period ( P , 0.05), bad teat condition ( P , 0.05) and reduced piglets born alive ( P , 0.001). For the LF competing risk analysis, culling increased with age at first farrowing ( P , 0.1). Special emphasis was placed on the influence of leg and teat conformation on sow survivability, although they did not affect sow failure due to DE ( P . 0.1). The overall leg-conformation score significantly influenced sow longevity in LP ( P , 0.001) and LF competing risk analyses ( P , 0.001), showing a higher hazard ratio (HR) for poorly conformed sows (1.013 and 4.366, respectively) than for well-conformed sows (0.342 and 0.246, respectively). Survival decreased with the presence of abnormal hoof growth in LP and LF analyses (HR 5 3.372 and 6.002, respectively; P , 0.001) and bumps or injuries to legs (HR 5 4.172 and 5.839, respectively; P , 0.01). Plantigradism reduced sow survival in the LP analysis ( P , 0.05), while sickle-hooked leg ( P , 0.05) impaired sow survival in the fertility-specific analysis. Estimates of heritability for longevity related to LP culling ranged from 0.008 to 0.024 depending on the estimation procedure, whereas heritability values increased to between 0.017 and 0.083 in LF analysis. These analyses highlighted substantial discrepancies in the sources of variation and genetic background of sow longevity depending on the cause of failure. The estimated heritabilities suggested that direct genetic improvement for sow longevity seemed feasible, although only a small genetic progress was expected.

Claw Characteristics of Culled Sows from Three Farrow-to-Finish Greek Farms. Part 1: Claw Length Measurements, Lesion Scores and Their Association

“…Heritabilities for hoof growth ranged from 0.24–0.27 in Landrace and from 0.36–0.38 in Large White sow populations [ 23 , 24 ]. Of importance was also the fact that abnormal hoof growth reduced survivability in Duroc [ 4 , 5 ] and Landrace sows [ 4 ]. Recently Johnson et al [ 2 ] showed that the lateral toes in Yorkshire sows were growing slower than the lateral toes in Duroc and Crossbred (Duroc × Yorkshire) sows.…”

“…The impaired claw quality has been shown to have significant negative impact on longevity, productive performance and welfare of sows [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The increased awareness of claw quality importance in sow breeding herds has guided researchers to focus on studying the frequency and severity of hoof growth abnormalities and lesions [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”