2013
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing globally, allying locally: Alliances between global rivals and host-country factors

Abstract: An emerging literature highlights the relationship between competitive intensity and the likelihood that two rival firms will form an alliance. Placing this argument in an international context, we first suggest that the global competitive intensity between two rival multinationals positively affects the likelihood that they will ally in any host country. Additionally, we highlight how a number of host-country contextual factors moderate the relationship between global competitive intensity and alliance format… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result provides support for our Hypothesis 2. Similarly, Model 4 shows that, while political instability does are interesting from a theoretical point of view, the random effects model may be an appropriate alternative (Certo and Semadini, 2006;Yu, Subramaniam, and Canella, 2013). not have a direct significant impact on firm performance, it reduces the effect of complementary assets on performance in that its interaction term is negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result provides support for our Hypothesis 2. Similarly, Model 4 shows that, while political instability does are interesting from a theoretical point of view, the random effects model may be an appropriate alternative (Certo and Semadini, 2006;Yu, Subramaniam, and Canella, 2013). not have a direct significant impact on firm performance, it reduces the effect of complementary assets on performance in that its interaction term is negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time‐invariant variable, the stock of complementary assets, is the basis of our first hypothesis. Extant literature argues that, in cases in which the time‐invariant variables are interesting from a theoretical point of view, the random effects model may be an appropriate alternative (Certo and Semadini, 2006; Yu, Subramaniam, and Canella, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, given our assumptions, we have not considered alternative scenarios, such as (1) the possible collaboration between the DF and the MNE (Williams & Du, 2014;Yu, Subramaniam, & Cannella, 2013), (2) the possibility that the MNE acquires the DF (Uhlenbruck, 2004), (3) the possibility that the DF buys the MNE's operations in the transition economy (Lin et al, 2009), and/or (4) the scenario that the DF may even acquire the MNE in its entirety . While our stylized and focused framework has allowed us to capture the essence of the dynamics between MNEs and DFs, rach above boundary conditions is a realistic scenario that needs to be explored in future work.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches directly consider rivalry in alliances. For example, coopetition studies focus on alliances between competitors and explore the emergence (Gnyawali, He, & Madhavan, ; Yu, Subramaniam, & Cannella, ) or outcome (Park & Ungson, ; Tong & Reuer, ) of such alliances. Based on the literature on competitive dynamics, scholars have recently viewed strategic alliances as a type of competitive action and investigated how the strategic alliance of a particular firm influences the behaviour and performance of its rivals.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%