2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.3041150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing geometric and inertial effects on local flow structure in thick gravity-driven fluid films

Abstract: The formation and presence of eddies within thick gravity-driven free-surface film flow over a corrugated substrate are considered, with the governing equations solved semianalytically using a complex variable method for Stokes flow and numerically via a full finite element formulation for the more general problem when inertia is significant. The effect of varying geometry ͑involving changes in the film thickness or the amplitude and wavelength of the substrate͒ and inertia is explored separately. For Stokes-l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this graph is equivalent to that in Fig. 4 in Scholle et al [24], which considers the corresponding free-surface film flow. Agreement between the finite element and the semi-analytical results is generally good, particularly for small clearances.…”
Section: Kinematically Induced Eddies In Stokes Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that this graph is equivalent to that in Fig. 4 in Scholle et al [24], which considers the corresponding free-surface film flow. Agreement between the finite element and the semi-analytical results is generally good, particularly for small clearances.…”
Section: Kinematically Induced Eddies In Stokes Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar behaviour to the film case, as one might expect at first glance, given that for large mean gaps/film thicknesses the flow local to the surface of the undulating plate should become insensitive to the exact form of the distant upper boundary. However, there is a difference between the two: in the film case, it is possible to induce a substantial eddy in a previously fully attached flow by increasing the film thickness [24]; this is not possible in the rigid-plate case. This difference between the two flows is due to the different driving forces in the two cases.…”
Section: Kinematically Induced Eddies In Stokes Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…among others, Szumbarski and Floryan (2006), Luo et al (2008), Scholle et al (2008), Malevich et al (2008), Khanafer et al (2009), andElshafei et al (2010). One common theme among these studies is to look into the geometrical effects due to wall corrugations on the flow resistance or pressure drop in the channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%