Competing by design, specialization and customization: manufacturing locks in the west midlands (uk)

Abstract

R. (2008): 'Competing by design, specialization and customization: manufacturing locks in the West Midlands (UK)', Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90 (2): 173-186.ABSTRACT. The past thirty years have seen major shifts and improvements in manufacturing productivity, bringing greater output but fewer jobs. As a result, manufacturing is now less visible in "post-industrial" societies. Nevertheless, manufacturing still matters in developed market economies but our understanding of manufacturing has failed to evolve with developments in the management and organization of production processes. This paper explores the lock industry in the West Midlands (UK), a traditional low-tech manufacturing sector. West Midlands lock companies that produced standardized, mass-produced products have experienced intensive competition from low-cost producers. Many of these firms have downsized their operations in the UK. Nevertheless, this is only one response to intensified competition. Lock firms located in the West Midlands are unable to compete on price and have shifted away from the production of mass-produced locks to concentrate on high value-added niche markets. The firms have developed inimitability strategies based around design, expertise, specialization, customization and nearness to market that assist them in maintaining their revenue and profit streams. Niche manufacturers have been far less susceptible and relatively immune to foreign competition and they continue to diversify product ranges by targeting specialist end-users. The emphasis is on producing high-quality locks in small batches that can be produced just-in-time to meet customers' requirements. The continued survival of these lock firms is based upon a strategy that includes the development of product-based competitive advantage combined with locational advantage and supported by efficient, responsive and customer-focused manufacturing processes.

Competitive low-tech manufacturing and challenges for regional policy in the European context--lessons from the Danish experience

“…Process innovation is central to the development and survival of low-tech firms, and process innovation is highly persistent in low-tech manufacturing (Heidenreich 2009;Kirner et al 2009;Cefis and Marsili 2011;Hervas-Oliver et al 2011b;Clausen et al 2012). An additional development in lowtech innovation strategies is the increasing emphasis on specialisation and customisation which allows low-tech firms to focus on high value-added niche markets (Bryson et al 2008;Belso-Martinez 2010;Hansen 2010). This also highlights the increasing significance of design, i.e.…”

The Energy Hot Potato and Governance of Value Chains: Power, Risk, and Organizational Adjustment in Intermediate Manufacturing Firms

“…In response to this situation, IMP firms continue to adjust to globalization through a series of nonprice‐based competitive advantages, such as the customization of products, products bundled with the provision of services, and the development of skills and processes that are difficult to replicate (Bryson et al. ; Bryson and Taylor ). Firms have moved to more complex manufacturing on the basis of a close dialogue with customers and combined development work between suppliers and customers.…”

“…This decline was consistent with the pattern observed in British manufacturing more generally. Both industries increased value added per employee through automation and a move toward higher-value products (Bryson et al 2008;Hansen 2010). Profitability was eroded as firms competed with companies based in lower labor-cost areas; the average profitability in the industries was 2.3 percent (the interviewees' answers ranged between −11.2 percent to 17 percent).…”

“…The nature of the competitiveness of firms in developed economies has been widely debated with a recent focus on noncost-based forms of competitiveness (Bryson, Taylor, and Cooper 2008;Bryson and Taylor 2010;Bryson and Rusten 2011;Tokatli 2012). Cost control is still critical (Giarratani, Gruver, and Jackson 2006;Kalafsky 2007) because each factor input (raw materials, energy, and labor) poses different challenges, constraints, and opportunities.…”

Balancing product and process sustainability against business profitability: sustainability as a competitive strategy in the property development process

“…On the one hand, it refl ects a commitment to a value system that may be carefully articulated on paper and in practice. On the other hand, it may be an attempt to construct a business strategy that combines a concern with values with an attempt to target a niche market or to develop market differentiation (Bryson et al, 2008). These are not mutually exclusive strategies.…”