2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing asymmetric fusion-fission and quasifission in neutron-deficient sub-lead nuclei

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the pre-neutron A pre and TKE distributions. These correspond to the bulk of information collected so far in the region for low-energy fission [9,20,28,29,33,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. The present work supplements the existing set of systems with 178 Hg, and discusses its features in the context of the asymmetric-fission island southwest of 208 Pb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…the pre-neutron A pre and TKE distributions. These correspond to the bulk of information collected so far in the region for low-energy fission [9,20,28,29,33,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. The present work supplements the existing set of systems with 178 Hg, and discusses its features in the context of the asymmetric-fission island southwest of 208 Pb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Clear evidence of asymmetric fission in pre-actinides near β stability, namely in 201 Tl, was established in light-ion induced fission by Itkis et al [7]. The recent observation of almost exclusively asymmetric fission in the neutron-deficient 180 Hg, for which two doubly-magic 90 Zr fragments were expected [21] has led to a resurgence of interest in fissioning pre-actinides, and measurements of additional systems [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] ascertained the occurence of asymmetric fission over an enlarged domain around lead. Finally, a consistent understanding of the fragment properties running from the "old" (actinide) to the "new" (pre-actinide) region of asymmetric fission is still missing [3,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetric components, clearly visible in the β-delayed [21,22] and electromagnetic-induced [23] fission experiments, in terms of the mean position of the light and heavy partners, in either mass A L,H or charge Z L,H depending on availability, are deduced from the measured fragment A (or Z) distributions. As for the fusion-induced fission approach, the location of the asymmetric peaks was determined in the corresponding references [24][25][26][27][28] based on the adjustment of the mass distribution by a superposition of Gaussian functions. The mean neutron and/or proton numbers of the fission partners are then derived in this work under the Unchanged-Charge-Density (UCD) assumption [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations