2000
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-078x2000000400020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competencia en Cladocera: implicancias de la sobreposición en el uso de los recursos tróficos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1a, C. dubia → M. micrura , F=1.902, P =0.115, Fig. 1b), which indicate that under the experimental conditions, M. micrura and C. dubia are not involved in interspecific competition (see also Martínez and Montecino 2000). However, the time to extinction of M. micrura was shorter in the presence of C. dubia (18 days) than in the control situation (29 days) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a, C. dubia → M. micrura , F=1.902, P =0.115, Fig. 1b), which indicate that under the experimental conditions, M. micrura and C. dubia are not involved in interspecific competition (see also Martínez and Montecino 2000). However, the time to extinction of M. micrura was shorter in the presence of C. dubia (18 days) than in the control situation (29 days) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…4), indicating that the presence of D. ambigua caused an indirect competitive interaction between the two specialist consumers. M. micrura and C. dubia are not involved in interspecific competition (see also Martínez and Montecino 2000). However, the time to extinction of M. micrura was shorter in the presence of C. dubia (18 days) than in the control situation (29 days) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Asimismo, debe destacarse que se le brindó su alimento preferido (Martínez, 2000;Martínez & Montecino, 2000). Debe destacarse que a pesar de que el volumen de los recipientes era reducido no hubo producción de machos como lo señalado por Martínez Jerónimo et al (2007), quienes postulan que la falta de espacio promueve dicha producción al impedir los desplazamientos o la obtención del alimento y no la vinculan al hacinamiento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La presencia de este complejo y la posible existencia de híbridos explicarían su elevada variabilidad morfológica y ecológica (Petrusek et al, 2004). Es una especie planctónica que muestra preferencia alimentaria por especies de Chlorella (Martínez & Montecino, 2000). Es conocido en los crustáceos que la duración del desarrollo embrionario está en función a la temperatura mientras que la duración del desarrollo postembrionario está influenciada por el alimento.…”
Section: Diaphanosoma Birgeiunclassified