2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competence as a Predictor of Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes for Youth: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly accepted level of p < .05 was used to indicate statistical significance. (The article by House et al in this issue more fully explains the review methods used [31]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly accepted level of p < .05 was used to indicate statistical significance. (The article by House et al in this issue more fully explains the review methods used [31]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we addressed generalizability across sub-groups by applying the same standards of evidence (i.e., two or more separate longitudinal studies showing a significant association between a connectedness sub-construct and at least one ASRH outcome) to findings by gender, race/ethnicity, and age. More details regarding the review process have been described by House et al [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the commonly accepted level of statistical significance (p < .05) to indicate an association or no association. For a more detailed description of the methods used in this review, see the article by House et al in this issue [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%