2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4829513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensator models for fluence field modulated computed tomography

Abstract: The results support that FFMCT may achieve regionally varying image quality distributions in good agreement with user-prescribed values, while limiting dose. The imposition of constraints inhibits dose reduction capacity and agreement with image quality plans but still yields significant improvement over what is afforded by conventional dose minimization techniques. These results suggest that FFMCT can be implemented effectively even when the modulator has limited modulation capabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there has been a lot interest within the CT imaging community concerning fluence field modulation (Kolditz et al 2010, Heuscher & Noo 2011, Heuscher & Noo 2012, Bartolac et al 2010, Bartolac et al 2011, Bartolac & Jaffray 2012, Chen et al 2011, Stiller et al 2012, Sperl et al 2010, Burion et al 2011, Hsieh & Pelc 2013 a , Hsieh & Pelc 2013 b ). The ability to modulate the incident x-ray fluence in CT imaging has been proposed to implement volume of interest imaging (VOI) (Bartolac et al 2010, Bartolac et al 2011, Bartolac & Jaffray 2012, Kolditz et al 2010, Heuscher & Noo 2011, Heuscher & Noo 2012, Chen et al 2011), improve standard CT imaging (Stiller et al 2012, Sperl et al 2010, Burion et al 2011, Hsieh & Pelc 2013 a , Hsieh & Pelc 2013 b ), and may be a necessary technology if photon counting CT is to overcome detector saturation and charge trapping problems (McCollough et al 2012, Shikhaliev 2009).…”
Section: Introduction: a Short History Of Ffm In Ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, there has been a lot interest within the CT imaging community concerning fluence field modulation (Kolditz et al 2010, Heuscher & Noo 2011, Heuscher & Noo 2012, Bartolac et al 2010, Bartolac et al 2011, Bartolac & Jaffray 2012, Chen et al 2011, Stiller et al 2012, Sperl et al 2010, Burion et al 2011, Hsieh & Pelc 2013 a , Hsieh & Pelc 2013 b ). The ability to modulate the incident x-ray fluence in CT imaging has been proposed to implement volume of interest imaging (VOI) (Bartolac et al 2010, Bartolac et al 2011, Bartolac & Jaffray 2012, Kolditz et al 2010, Heuscher & Noo 2011, Heuscher & Noo 2012, Chen et al 2011), improve standard CT imaging (Stiller et al 2012, Sperl et al 2010, Burion et al 2011, Hsieh & Pelc 2013 a , Hsieh & Pelc 2013 b ), and may be a necessary technology if photon counting CT is to overcome detector saturation and charge trapping problems (McCollough et al 2012, Shikhaliev 2009).…”
Section: Introduction: a Short History Of Ffm In Ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to modulate the incident x-ray fluence in CT imaging has been proposed to implement volume of interest imaging (VOI) (Bartolac et al 2010, Bartolac et al 2011, Bartolac & Jaffray 2012, Kolditz et al 2010, Heuscher & Noo 2011, Heuscher & Noo 2012, Chen et al 2011), improve standard CT imaging (Stiller et al 2012, Sperl et al 2010, Burion et al 2011, Hsieh & Pelc 2013 a , Hsieh & Pelc 2013 b ), and may be a necessary technology if photon counting CT is to overcome detector saturation and charge trapping problems (McCollough et al 2012, Shikhaliev 2009). …”
Section: Introduction: a Short History Of Ffm In Ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TV-based ones, can also be used. We also noticed that there is current research on fluence field modulation in CBCT, which has the potential to yield a CBCT image of a prescribed spatially varying image quality while using only the minimally necessary amount of radiation exposure to the patient (Bartolac et al , 2011; Szczykutowicz and Mistretta, 2014; Bartolac, 2014; Graham et al , 2007). However, currently it is still challenging to achieve this in practice due to hardware limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 It can be expected that an even further dose and scatter reduction could be achieved if a compensator could adjust its FM in real time. Work in this area has already begun and promising results have been demonstrated by Sperl et al 5 and Bartolac et al [6][7][8] In the present study, we are considering CT images that will be read by clinicians for general use; therefore, image quality must be maintained over the entire imaging FOV. This differs from the FFMCT work of Bartolac et al [6][7][8] and Heuscher and Noo 9,10 in which subregions inside the FOV were defined and signal-to-ratio (SNR) was boosted inside these regions and lowered outside allowing for an overall dose savings for the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is more similar to the work of Sperl et al 5 in this regard. However, the work of Bartolac et al [6][7][8] was purely simulation based and our proposed FM method could theoretically be used to implement their methods experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%