2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3663070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensator design for improved counterbalancing in high speed atomic force microscopy

Abstract: High speed atomic force microscopy can provide the possibility of many new scientific observations and applications ranging from nano-manufacturing to the study of biological processes. However, the limited imaging speed has been an imperative drawback of the atomic force microscopes. One of the main reasons behind this limitation is the excitation of the AFM dynamics at high scan speeds, severely undermining the reliability of the acquired images. In this research, we propose a piezo based, feedforward contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the RBS signal to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (See Supplementary Materials for details). The advantage of the RBS over more traditional signals (e.g., a sinusoidal sweep) is stimulation of the system with relatively higher power, which results in less noisy system identification (i.e., the spectrum of the dynamic modulus (Bozchalooi et al, 2011; Ljung, 1999)). To generate the RBS signal, a sign operator (sign(x)=1 for x ≥ 0 and sign(x) =−1 for x < 0) is applied to a set of simulated white Gaussian noise data implemented in LabView (National Instrument Co., Austin, TX).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the RBS signal to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (See Supplementary Materials for details). The advantage of the RBS over more traditional signals (e.g., a sinusoidal sweep) is stimulation of the system with relatively higher power, which results in less noisy system identification (i.e., the spectrum of the dynamic modulus (Bozchalooi et al, 2011; Ljung, 1999)). To generate the RBS signal, a sign operator (sign(x)=1 for x ≥ 0 and sign(x) =−1 for x < 0) is applied to a set of simulated white Gaussian noise data implemented in LabView (National Instrument Co., Austin, TX).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with small cantilevers, developments in scanner design and improved control algorithms greatly increased AFM imaging speed. These high-speed scanners include counterbalanced scanners, 6,14 microresonator scan stages, 15 flexure-based scanners, 8,16,17 shear piezo scanners, 18 and MEMS-based scanners. 19 Highspeed AFM control strategies include cross-coupling cancellation in piezotube scanners, 20,21 optimized fast amplitude detection and feedback electronics for high bandwidth, 6,18 dynamic PID, 22 and model-based H ∞ control methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the XY scanner [ Fig. 1(a)], we used a flexure stage with four-fold symmetry, which is similar to the design reported by Hansma et al [9][10][11][12][13] The main body is made of stainless steel (SS304 or SS430). The sample stage at the center is connected to the four sides by three beams for each.…”
Section: Separate-type High-speed Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Subsequently, the design has been further improved by other researchers. 12, 13 Tabak et al developed a micrometer-sized Z scanner with an integrated tip for obtaining a high resonance frequency. 14 They also used an XY sample scanner that is separated from the Z scanner to achieve low cross talk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%